On August 18, 2016

“Second Amendment people”

By implicitly encouraging “the Second Amendment people” to assassinate presidential rival Hillary Clinton—lest she appoint Supreme Court justices who would take away their right to bear arms—Donald Trump has produced one more opportunity for Democrats to condemn him on purely moral grounds. This has been one of the Democrats’ primary messages during the election season—that, regardless of one’s politics, one must recognize that Donald Trump is an indecent, undignified, dangerous, irresponsible, morally hideous human being.
Personally, I’m not sure how much longer Democrats need to continue to beat this particular drum, although, to be fair, Trump continues to create situations in which the have-you-no-decency angle becomes inevitable. At this point, it seems safe to say that virtually no one who values “decency” is on the Trump bandwagon anyway—that most of his supporters love him precisely because he is indecent, undignified, dangerous, and irresponsible: the type of guy who is not afraid to adopt openly morally hideous positions and make death threats against his enemies. Trump’s base looks to him for a mirror image of its own callous selfishness: they don’t want someone who feigns care or respect for others—they want a scumbag who will “get the job done” with no reservations, the job in this case being to restore wealth and power to white Americans.
Liberals have to tell his supporters what his supporters fear: that the disgusting man nevertheless is not one of them and does not care for them even a little bit.
Liberals have to tell his supporters what his supporters fear: that the disgusting man nevertheless is not one of them and does not care for them even a little bit.
Most of the outrage regarding Trump’s recent remarks has focused on the possibility that his words could inspire real violence and on the increased fears for Clinton’s safety that now exist because he is such a terrible person. These are legitimate points, but in fact Trump’s quip should offend gun owners at least as much as it offends Clinton supporters. Who, exactly, are these “Second Amendment people”?
Well, for Trump, they’re the same people whom most anti-gun liberals imagine when they think of the backwoods illiterates and frustrated suburban loners whose pathetically barren lives contain no reason for them to feel strong or secure except in the company of the ridiculous arsenal of weaponry that they’ll probably never use except to shoot themselves by accident someday, unless someone like Donald Trump gives them the confidence first to put a few bullets inside a supposedly villainous woman who, in reality, was never actually going to try to take away their guns anyway: people clinging with blinding ferocity to a transparently irrelevant 18th-century dictate arising from a particular (and now obsolete) set of historical and technological circumstances, as if it were not only a permanent commandment from God but a deliverance from the worthlessness of their own lives.
In short: idiots. This idea of their idiocy is contained not only within Trump’s suggestion that gun owners might be willing to murder the president (!) but also within the very phrase with which he addresses this demographic: “the Second Amendment people”—not, say, “people who value the Second Amendment,” which would include most of the Republican Party and many Democrats. “The Second Amendment people” are, for Trump, a fringe group defined totally by a singular weird obsession, like gluten-free people. Like “the blacks” and “the Mexicans,” “the Second Amendment people” are not a group to which Trump belongs.
As I said before, Trump supporters already know that he’s awful, but what they want to believe is that this awful man is on their side, and he will use his awfulness—all the ruthlessness and crooked tricks for which the self-righteous liberals condemn him—on their behalf. My guess is that this is the hardest part for Trump to sell and that, deep down, even many of his most fervent backers suspect that this silver-spoon billionaire from New York City, this attention-loving former Democrat, does not really love them back.
In November, Hillary Clinton will probably win in a landslide, but if, just in case, liberals are still hoping to dissuade a few potential Trump voters, they can’t keep telling Trump fans what they already know, which is that the man is disgusting. Liberals have to tell his supporters what his supporters fear: that the disgusting man nevertheless is not one of them and does not care for them even a little bit.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Lessons abroad, Vermont recharge

June 12, 2024
Building a Killington Dream Lodge, part 17  What a difference a year can make. I was really excited about the changes taking place in our Killington ski lodge while I was away attending Schiller College Paris my sophomore year and Graz Center for the second summer. Meanwhile, in Vermont once the roof was done, Dad…

June: ‘bloom whereyou are planted’

June 12, 2024
June is usually thought of as the beginning of summer. School is out, we open our summer houses and maybe plan a vacation. I was given a book called “The Big Book of 30-Day Challenges” written by Rosanna Casper. It sat on a table for a long time with me just looking at it every…

Summer vacation for students in the 50s

June 12, 2024
Whether it’s 2024 or 1954 kids share the enthusiasm that comes from being on school vacation during the summer months. However, the way that their free time is spent has few similarities. As often happens when my weekly breakfast group gets together we take a “look back” at various things and recently we recalled what…

Secrets of early summer

June 12, 2024
Shhhh. Don’t tell anybody, but this is one of my all time favorite weeks of the year. The one where I make myself so exhausted that I am asleep before my head even hits the pillow. The one where I am up with the sunrise for no reason except that I cannot wait for the…