On March 9, 2016

Whose 1 percent is it, anyway?

Dear Editor,

In the wake of the recent election it has come to my attention that a certain prominent member of the community has made some proprietary statements to the Killington Pico Areas Association (KPAA) concerning the 1 percent options tax. This person stated the tax is raised by the businesses and infers because the original article voted on dedicated the proceeds to “economic development” that somehow the town owes it to the KPAA, its members, and the business community. Further he states we should not be paying off the Green Mountain National Golf Course (GMNGC) debt with that money.

First and foremost, the town voted to put the 1 percent option tax revenue into the General Fund because of the enormous real estate tax burden the GMNGC debt would have put onto property owners. At the time we had somewhere in the vicinity of $2.5 million in short term debt on the town’s books which was incurred to pay off past GMNGC bond payments, never mind the $3 million or so still outstanding on the bond.

Secondly, the town refinanced the short term debt incurring close to another million dollars in fees and interest.

Third, and finally, GMNGC was the result of the so called Economic Recovery Act of 1996, an effort at economic development to help that same business community. It was supposed to be a self-financed program. Well that did not happen and it fell into the taxpayers lap as the town guaranteed the bond! So now we are paying off an economic development project with economic development money which is the way it should be.

So for a prominent member of the business community, who has profited from whatever stimulus GMNGC provided to our local economy, to say that we should not be paying of the GMNGC debt with money supposedly dedicated to economic development is misguided at best and disingenuous at worst.

Here’s a quote from an email sent to what looks to be KPAA executive committee members, “First the 1% tax is raised by the businesses of the town. The original intent of the tax was designed to market and develop our resort area. Not to pay debt on a golf course that competes with our largest contributor, Killington Resort.”

The businesses do not “raise” this money, they collect it from their patrons under the force of law.

Vito Rasenas, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Homeless legislation encounters Sturm and Drang

May 7, 2025
A cohort of Vermont’s social service providers has embarked on an editorial campaign challenging the House’s recent legislation that would disrupt the status quo of homeless services funding administration. Angus Chaney, executive director of Rutland’s Homeless Prevention Center (HPC), appears to be the author of the editorial and is joined by about a dozen fellow…

From incarceration to community care: Reinvest in health, justice, common good

May 7, 2025
By Brian Cina Editor’s note: Brian Cina is a VermontState Representative for Chittenden-15. Cina is a clinical social worker with a full-time therapy practice and is a part-time crisis clinician. State-sanctioned punishment and violence perpetuate harm under the guise of accountability, justice, and public safety. Since 2017, Governor Phil Scott has pushed for new prisons…

Tech, nature are out of synch

May 7, 2025
Dear Editor, I have been thinking since Earth Day about modern technology and our environment and how much they are out of touch with each other.  Last summer, my wife and I traveled to Fairbanks, Alaska, for a wedding. While there, we went to the Museum of the North at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks. It…

Under one roof: Vermont or bust!

May 7, 2025
Dear Editor, We’re heading north and so excited. We’re moving full time to Vermont! For decades we’ve been snow birds, like my parents, spending half the year in Bradenton, Florida. But now our Florida house is up for sale — a 1929 Spanish Mediterranean brimming with beauty and charm. A young family we hope will…