Speed limit on Killington Road to change Nov. 24

By Curt Peterson

Soon, drivers in Killington will have to pay more attention to their speed. At its Sept. 23 meeting the Select Board approved reducing the speed limit on Killington Road from 35 mph to 30 mph and on River Road to 25 mph the whole way — the change is effective after 60 days. 

According to Town Manager Michael Ramsey, new speed limit signs have been ordered and will be installed the first week in December. 

“It’s the right time to make this change,” said Killington Police Chief Whit Montgomery. “The current 35 limit has been in effect since the road was built. We’re about to enjoy significant development, and the reduced limit will make the road more safe for increased traffic and pedestrians.”

 The chief said most locals obey the current limit, and there are only a few who seem to be habitual speeders. Killington attracts lots of visitors who generally obey the local traffic laws, too, he said.

But not all do. 

Two drivers were arrested this fall for traveling 80 mph and 75 mph on Killington Road.

“They were both ticketed and fined,” said Montgomery.

Fines are tied to the speed involved. If clocked at 10 mph over the speed limit; the standard ticket is $105 and 2 points; for 15 mph over it’s $151 and 3 point; for 30 mph over it’s $289 and 5 points —anything over 30 is categorized as excessive speed and drivers can be arrested, Montgomery noted. 

Montgomery expects a “period of education and adjustment” but said he’s confident the adjustment will come with time. 

There are auto accidents on Killington Road, but not an extraordinary number, the chief said.

“There were a few very tragic incidents on the highway this summer,” Montgomery said, referring to four Route 4 fatalities between Killington and Rutland during the summer and fall.

Speeding on the state highway is a problem in Killington. 

“One driver was recently cited for driving 99 mph in the Flats,” he said, referring to the portion of Route 4 between River Road and East Mountain Road.

Town Planner Lisa Davis told the Mountain Times making Route 4 safer is a challenge for the town.

“Killington will be seeking a village center designation but that does not automatically come with authority to change any speed limits,” she said. “Once we secure that designation, we hope we can get VTrans to turn a portion of Route 4 over to the town — then the town would have authority to lower speed limits and possibly install ‘traffic calming’ measures, such as speed bumps or pavement narrowing. There are a lot of steps before we get there and certainly no guarantees.”


5 comments on “Speed limit on Killington Road to change Nov. 24

  1. Sounds like better revenue generation for the town fund. Can’t make money when most are driving within 10mph of the speed limit. Oh what to do?!

    “There are auto accidents on Killington Road, but not an extraordinary number, the chief said.”

    So what problem are you fixing here? Oh, right, the outside revenue problem.

  2. The reduction of the speed limit will likely drive revenue. Not safety! The rise in taxes vs charging developers add development should be a consideration before expanding further restrictions. Driving 30 MP will not create an exemplary traffic safety record for the town. Simply create more controls and costs to the residents and tourism. BTW, we are a tourist town that depends on tourism. As a home owner and resident for 4-5 months of the year, this looks like another cost.

  3. I like the idea because I have been working in Killington for three years and it is the only road that scares me and I use it six times a week but whenever I start to be close to Killington my heart always wants to leave despite what I drive six times weekly for approximately almost three years and I feel the same scare and my heart fluttered as the first day I went through but I have personally seen or passed by in the moment that the last four accidents have happened, they have been people I don’t know but it has broken my heart I have cried for people I don’t know and it is not fair for you to guide with certainty that you are doing well with your belt, you are guiding to the limit that is allowed and a careless person who does not care about his life or that of others comes along and guides without any caution and without any consequences believing that it is your street and it is not like that but I am happy with this news and I hope that now many accidents will be avoided
    Thanks 🙏🏾😊

  4. Another 20 years and it’ll be faster to walk…. Hard to understand the rationale when a) cars are much safer today than 50 years ago, b) pedestrian and cyclist controls to promote safety are widespread today but virtually non-existent 50 years ago and c) highway engineering is much better today. By all possible logic, speed limits should be raised, not lowered. Secondary to this is that traffic controls that slow down the rate of traffic, including unrealistically low limits, stop signs and traffic signals, etc., are grossly wasteful in terms of fuel economy and emissions. Every time you apply the brakes you’re converting inertia to heat that will not be recovered when you have to resume speed.

Comments are closed.

Mountain Times Newsletter

Sign up below to receive the weekly newsletter, which also includes top trending stories and what all the locals are talking about!