On July 14, 2021

Slow down those vehicles

Dear Editor,

I have never understood why vehicles needed to be able to go so fast.

First, it could cut down on high-speed chases and crashes. For police, this could mean less time monitoring for speeders and focusing on more important things.

Obviously you can go 60 mph in a 25-mph zone and still injure yourself or others, but I believe the ability of the vehicle to go so fast enables such recklessness.

Second, and more important to me, is efficiency. I am no engineer but it would seem logical that you could optimize gearing, shifting and engine size if, for instance vehicles had a max speed of 80 mph.

Our Odessey has no need of going over 100 mph, which I know it could (no, I have not tried it). I ask, is there a vehicle made that can’t go 100 mph?

It seems odd to me the government has focused on mile per gallon standards but nobody had thought of speed regulation. My guess is that someone said it would impinge on their rights.

I say all this in the context of Vermont and the U.S. not being ready anytime soon for all-electric vehicles. Currently our grid is not capable of keeping up with the air-conditioning; how does one expect it to charge vehicles?

I haven’t even taken into account all the other appliances that they want to get rid of to add to the electric grid. I am ready and willing to reduce our carbon footprint but in a realistic timeline.

Shayne Olmsted, White River Junction

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…