On November 5, 2014

Resort “improvements” do not help residents

Dear Editor,

I’ve been skiing Killington for the past 35 years. I’ve been a regular season pass holder for over 20 years. I am a full time resident for the past 10 years. I am currently, for the first time, a mid-week season pass holder. Two weeks ago on a Friday, I had the occasion to take guests up to the Peak Lodge for lunch. I paid for their Gondola passes at $20 each, but much to my surprise, I was only given a 20 percent discount for both my wife and myself. First, the $20 for the 5 minute ride, borders on larceny. Second, I am a season pass holder and should be afforded the ride as part of my season pass!

If you can remember two years ago, the Resort changed the qualifications for a senior season pass and wound up charging about $200 more. The reason? Big brother has noticed that there are many regular skiers who are skiing the mountain who are of the senior age. My group will number over 30 people on a weekday morning. So much for the little old guy and gal!

So, here’s my plan, which I was going to do anyway.

I plan to lobby extremely hard about giving the mountain back the 1 percent option tax. We as residents will see no benefit whatsoever. The businesses on Killington Road will see some residual benefit, but as soon as that village goes up and the first phase of that 30,000 sq. ft. of retail, guess what will happen? Restaurants, pizza joints, sandwich shops, and groceries will be sold there, and the Killington Road businesses will suffer. And that’s just the first phase, there will be additional retail space to come. If the mountain needs the benefit of the retention of the 1 percent option tax to improve their summer business, let them go to their parent Powdr Corp. and get some of the $183 million they just got from the sale of Park City to Vail.

Oh, and by the way, I hear that the mountain is licking their chops at the overwhelming response to that $20 ride.

Richard Kropp, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…