On March 13, 2024
Opinions

Rejection of school budgets shows need for new funding method

By Don Tinney

Editor’s note: Don Tinney is a longtime high school English teacher who serves as the elected president of the 13,000-member Vermont-NEA. The Vermont-National Education Association is the union of Vermont educators.

My fellow 13,000 members and I know that last night’s rejection of nearly a third of all school budgets isn’t a repudiation of our local public schools and the tens of thousands of Vermont students they serve every day. Rather, it’s a reasonable reaction to completely unrealistic spikes in property taxes driven by events over which our dedicated local school boards have no control.

We know that local communities are struggling, and most can’t afford year-over-year property tax increases of the sort proposed this week. 

A once-in-a-generation confluence of events conspired to boost tax rates: the end of pandemic aid; a new pupil weighting law and its since-abandoned 5% growth cap for towns affected by the new law; inflation; decades of deferred and neglected building maintenance by the state; rising healthcare costs; and spiking property values caused by our acute housing shortage.

While we are grateful that the governor and legislature apologized for their part in this year’s school budget fiasco, there is much more that can be done. For years, we have advocated for a simpler and fairer way to pay for our schools than the regressive property tax: an education income tax that will raise more money from those most able to afford it. 

We also implore the Legislature to take a serious look at how our local schools are governed and organized. And we continue to insist that lawmakers stem the flow of nearly $100 million a year in public education money to private schools without any accountability to Vermont’s taxpayers.

For centuries, Vermonters have placed a high priority on — and demonstrated dedicated support of — our local public schools. This week showed that despite that track record, there is a point where Vermonters can’t afford double-digit increases in their property taxes. We must get this right so that Vermont’s students – our future – have all the tools they need to become healthy, happy, and ready to pursue their dreams.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness

July 24, 2024
By Frank Knaack and Falko Schilling Editor’s note: This commentary is by Frank Knaack, executive director of the Housing and Homelessness Alliance of Vermont, and Falko Schilling, advocacy director of the ACLU of Vermont. Homelessness in Vermont is at its highest level on record, as more people struggle to afford sky high-rents and housing costs. According…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

The arc of agingand leadership

July 24, 2024
By Bill Schubart Like a good novel, our lives have a narrative arc, during which we are actively participating in and relevant to our world. We are born, rise slowly into sensual consciousness and gradually process what we see and feel. Our juvenile perceptions gradually become knowledge, and, if all goes well, that knowledge binds…