On July 29, 2015

Proposed rate increases should be rejected

Dear Editor,

The Affordable Care Act, despite its name, is not making health care affordable. One in five people in Vermont are struggling with medical bills. Meanwhile, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont, as a “non-profit,” will receive a tax break of over $15 million this year, while ten of its executives are paid up to half a million dollars each.

BCBS has asked the Green Mountain Care Board (GMCB) to approve a premium increase averaging at 8.4 percent, with increases of up to 14.3 percent on some plans. This is considerably more than most people’s wages rise in a year. This big win for BCBS will do nothing to increase in access to care, especially for people on basic plans with high deductibles and co-pays. If anything points to the need to get the insurance industry out of health care, it is the effrontery of BCBS’s request for premium increases that will make health care less, not more, affordable.

Act 48, Vermont’s universal health care law, created Green Mountain Care “to contain costs and to provide, as a public good, comprehensive, affordable, high-quality, publicly financed health coverage” for all Vermont residents. When deciding on rate requests, the Board is supposed to consider, among other things, whether the request is affordable, promotes access to care, promotes quality care, and is equitable. The proposed rate increases meet none of these criteria and should be rejected by the GMCB.

On July 29, the GMCB will be taking public testimony on the BCBS rate request starting at 1 p.m. at 89 Main St., Montpelier, 2nd floor.  Testimony can also be submitted electronically until July 29 at ratereview.vermont.gov.

If you purchase insurance through Vermont Health Connect it is particularly urgent that you let the GMCB know how this will affect you.

Though Vermont is still on the path to universal health care, one big step the GMCB can take is to get the insurance company profiteers out of our health care system. Our bodies and our minds are not commodities or numbers to be crunched by actuaries determined to ensure that insurers come out ahead.

Sincerely,

Ellen Schwartz, Brattleboro

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…