On January 7, 2015

Preserving the backcountry as backcountry

Dear Editor,

After reading the article in the Jan 1 edition about the State/U.S. forest service “considering a back country plan” I felt compelled to remind hunters, skiers, snowboarders, hikers, snowshoe folks, etc, that the National Forest has been, and is open for your exploring enjoyment. As a native Vermonter I’ve spent my entire youth skiing and hiking the Green Mountain National Forest, with map and compass, looking for those areas that were good to ski for a few years, and feeling the reward when you found a few hidden spots (without others around). Then, as the forest is not static, those spots disappear, change, and the search was on again for the next gem. What makes the Green Mountain National Forest so unique is that it’s not riddled with maintained trails, parking lots, or signs. We have a trail, it’s called “The Long Trail” and it runs the spine of the Green Mountains. Get on it, north or southbound, gain some elevation head, east or west and find yourself a natural “line” or “glade.” Use a TOPO map, and GPS, you’ll get your fix.

I’m not sure when the U.S. Forest Service (funded by tax payers, let us not forget) decided it was their right to develop 210 acres of “glades” which will be maintained  asski trails in the National Forest. As a backcountry enthusiast and tax payer I find this offensive, another classic example of unnecessary government jobs, wasted time, and misuse of funds.

If you’re on a trail, you’re not in the backcountry.

Regards, Jesse Gallagher, Pittsfield

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…