On November 12, 2014

One percent sales tax is still needed; will help reduce other taxes

Dear Editor,

Local option taxes were authorized by the state legislature to “reduce the dislocations in those municipalities that may be caused by reforms to the method of financing public education under the Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1997.” In other words the option taxes were authorized to mitigate the egregious tax increase caused by the education act. The Town of Killington took advantage of this legislation and imposed these option taxes, which included a one percent sales tax.

There is presently a strong movement at state level to reform the education tax in order to reduce the burden it imposes. However the burden is still there. Thus the need for the revenue from the one percent sales tax still exists. To eliminate the sales tax at this time would cause property owners’ taxes to rise in a manner contrary to the intent of the state legislation.

Eliminating the tax thereby increasing property taxes would also infer that education tax reform is not needed. This would make it more difficult to accomplish the needed reform to reduce taxes.

The town has the burden of paying off the debt associated with our municipal golf course. When the course was built we were told that in the future we may need a slight tax increase to pay the debt. At that time the tax burden imposed by the Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1997 did not exist. A small tax increase was not a problem. Now we have the burden of that act and a small tax increase is a problem. Now we need the revenue from the one percent sales tax to cover our costs and avert a tax increase. This is especially true given the coming debate over the future of our fire house.

Another issue is the town’s ability to borrow money. Lenders look to a borrower’s ability to repay a loan. In the ease of a municipality lenders look to the ability of the borrower to raise tax revenue. Eliminating the one percent sales tax would impact this ability thus making financing town debt more difficult.

Transients now pay the one percent sales tax on purchases they make here. This helps pay for municipal services like road maintenance, police and fire protection. Should the one percent sales tax be eliminated we would be eliminating a means by which transients help pay for the services they use.

In the future there may be education spending and tax reform that lower taxes to a reasonable person’s level. In the alternative the ski resort could assume the debt on the municipal golf course and supply us with a new fire house. Under these circumstances eliminating the option tax could be practical.

However at this time rescinding the one percent sales tax makes no sense.

Sincerely,

David Rosenblum, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…