On May 18, 2022

How ranked choice voting can save our elections

Dear Editor,

The spoiler effect — a problem that we know all too well, yet too little about. Each time the presidential election comes around we are met with the inevitable frustration and disillusionment caused by our two-party system. Instead of voting for who we truly believe in, we often cast our ballots for whomever we deem to be the lesser of two evils. Oftentimes, my heart lies with a third party candidate that I know just doesn’t have a chance of winning. I know that voting for anyone besides one of the two major candidates is only making it easier for the candidate I like the least to win. So, instead of casting a vote with conviction, I cast one out of fear. This, in essence, is the spoiler effect.

Many of us believe that voting is not only a right, but a civic duty. So why does only 50% of the population show up to the polls to begin with? In part, many feel they lack the ability to vote for who and what they truly believe in; and really, are they so wrong?

I didn’t learn until recently that there are actually many viable solutions to the spoiler effect and our troublesome election system at large—one of them is ranked choice voting’ (RCV). In short, RCV allows voters the option to rank candidates in order of preference: One, two, three, and so forth. If your vote cannot help your top choice win, your vote counts for your next choice. In this system, you can vote for the candidate that you truly love, while having the peace of mind that your vote won’t be thrown away.

Ranked choice voting is a way to ensure elections are fair for all voters, and it’s already a reality! All 50 states (especially Vermont) should follow Alaska, Hawaii, Kansas, and Wyoming’s lead in 2024 by adopting ranked choice voting as part of their primary process. If you’d like to learn more about RCV, please visit fairvote.org.

Isabella O’Connor, Royalton

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness

July 24, 2024
By Frank Knaack and Falko Schilling Editor’s note: This commentary is by Frank Knaack, executive director of the Housing and Homelessness Alliance of Vermont, and Falko Schilling, advocacy director of the ACLU of Vermont. Homelessness in Vermont is at its highest level on record, as more people struggle to afford sky high-rents and housing costs. According…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

The arc of agingand leadership

July 24, 2024
By Bill Schubart Like a good novel, our lives have a narrative arc, during which we are actively participating in and relevant to our world. We are born, rise slowly into sensual consciousness and gradually process what we see and feel. Our juvenile perceptions gradually become knowledge, and, if all goes well, that knowledge binds…