On March 27, 2024
Letters

For the lack of a coherent plan

 

Dear Editor,

Recently, a Chittenden County Superior Court judge handed down a decision siding with the state against the plaintiffs in a case brought by Vermont Legal Aid on behalf of those who are living unhoused (a.k.a. homeless) and had been evicted from motels during the middle of March.

Although I disagree with the decision by the judge, I agree with the statement made toward the end of it: Parties on all sides of this case, “could work together to design a big-picture approach to the problem rather than continuing to cobble together short-term solutions while in crisis mode.”

In fact, while thinking upon these and related matters myself, prior to the judge’s decision being handed down, this is, generally speaking, the conclusion I had reached as well.

Finding a better way to meaningfully and seriously address homelessness within the state long-term has been handled by all sides as nothing more than a political football.

Everyone is looking to someone else to figure it out, come up with a plan and act first.

What both the administration and the Legislature have been doing up to now has been rather haphazard, lacking any actual, coherent, real, significant and workable action plan to move forward with.

Given that this seemingly formidable task could take a while to accomplish, one might ask what is one to do in the meantime?

One solution that comes to mind might be to have high-level representatives from each party involved be locked within a room together and not be allowed to leave until they have a workable plan to put in place. 

They could use the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) annex building located in Berlin and have access to Porta-Potties, as provided to those who stayed at the temporary regional homeless shelter hosted there.

Morgan W. Brown, Montpelier

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

New wildlife law protects against wanton waste

July 17, 2024
Dear Editor, Many cruel and unethical practices occur in Vermont’s fields and forests during hunting and trapping seasons, but you’ll never hear about them from Vermont Fish & Wildlife. Thankfully, watchdog groups like Protect Our Wildlife shed light on the most egregious, cruel and wanton acts of violence against wild animals in Vermont. One such act…

Best use of ed funding?

July 10, 2024
Dear Editor, There has been no shortage of notable quotes from Montpelier recently, and not many of them charitable. Reading that our governor referred to lawmakers as “a bit arrogant” in overriding his vetoes at a press conference brings to mind several historical quotes and sayings. What immediately came to mind were “Let he who…