On January 18, 2016

Speed traps create bad visitor experiences, affect revenue

Dear Editor,

My friend John and I were pulled over in Woodstock, Vt., at 10:30 p.m. New Year’s Eve. John has a Rhode Island license place, therefore, I wasn’t surprised. I have a Massachusetts license plate and was pulled over in Pittsford, Vt., on the 4th of July, 2014. My parents and siblings have Connecticut license plates and have been pulled over in Plymouth, Vt., in years past, too. But now we all know where the speed traps are.

But that’s not the point. I am a former Safe Routes to School Coordinator for Walk Boston, a pedestrian advocacy group. The point is to drive safely, regardless of where you come from, and where you are.

I fought the 4th of July, 2014, speeding ticket and won. I had a folder full of “evidence” that the signage in Pittsford was not up to snuff, the way that it is in Woodstock, Bridgewater, and Plymouth, Vt. Some Vermont towns do an excellent road signage display, which lets you know you are entering a congested area. But it only gets noticed after the fact. Coming from the city, you know that you have pretty much two speed limits—street or highway. In the city you “feel” you are in a congested area because you see pedestrians. In Vermont, a “congested” area is explained to you by a police officer after he pulls you over to give you a ticket. And it needs to be explained further as to what you missed in signage, because road signage is boring!

An engaging way to slow people down would be something like: 1) Adding speed texture in the road when approaching congested areas. 2) Larger than life signage, or shaped signage. 3) Day glow/glow-in-the-dark bumpy post holding speed signage. 4) Being helpful, the sign has a lamp post attached, or a bat house attached.

But none of these suggestions would work if Vermont cost justifies the ticket money they bring in. I analyzed the Ritz Carlton case in my MBA program. I can’t remember the exact figures, but having roughly 5 percent of customers having a bad experience can filter through 50 percent of the potential business, causing an adverse effect in revenue.

Let’s be smart about all of the costs here, and the adverse effect being pulled over by the cops really has.

Best intentions,

Anne Kirby, Milton, Mass., and Killington, Vt.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Missing the mark on ed reform

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, If and when the governor and Legislature agree on something they call “transformational educational reform,” it’s unlikely to be what most people expected or wanted. Vermonters won’t see the property tax relief they were hoping for because changes to the funding system will be a few years off. Instead, the first sign of…

H.454: Another tax hike disguised as funding reform

June 11, 2025
By Ryan Heraty Editor’s note: Ryan Heraty is the superintendent of the Lamoille South Supervisory Union and a doctoral student at the University of Vermont, studying education finance and public policy. Most Vermonters agree our state is facing an affordability crisis, yet few suggest the solution is to raise taxes on low and middle-income Vermonters.…

CHIP is a game changer

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, Vermont just took a bold, historic step toward solving one of the most urgent issues facing our state: the lack of affordable and attainable homes for Vermonters of all income levels and backgrounds. With the passage of the Community Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP) during the 2025 legislative session, the state now has a…

Want lower taxes? Then let’s reform education the smart way

June 11, 2025
By Bryce Sammel Editor’s note: Bryce Sammel, of Barnard, previously served on and chaired both the Barnard Academy and Mountain Views school boards. Vermonters are rightly worried about taxes. With rising costs across the board, including property taxes, health care and energy bills, many residents, especially those without school-aged children, are asking a fair question:…