On November 10, 2021

Gov. Scott, give towns the tools to protect their residents

Dear Editor,

The recent news that Vermont experienced 487 Covid cases on Thursday, Nov. 4, breaking the all-time record by more than 100 cases, was extremely disheartening even to the most optimistic Vermonters.

Friday followed on its heels with 377 new cases and a 3.3% positivity rate. With more than 90% of eligible Vermonters vaccinated, one has to wonder what is going on.

The governor issued his emergency executive order on March 13, 2020, and it served Vermonters extremely well through the first year of the pandemic. Back in the spring of this year and most of last year, Vermont was the envy of the nation. Through most of the spring and summer, the moving average of new cases in Vermont was in the single digits.

In response, when Vermont hit the 80% vaccination rate among eligible Vermonters on June 15, Gov. Scott rescinded all state Covid-19 restrictions and ended the declared state of emergency.

Clearly, we are not out of the woods. Even with a 90% vaccination rate, our cases are rocketing up. And the number of breakthrough cases is concerning.

Vermont is a significant and unwelcome outlier in the national downward trend of cases right now. Gov. Scott continues to encourage mask wearing, getting vaccinated and socially distancing.

Is encouragement enough? We know that masks work. Several communities moved to impose a mask mandate this fall when cases started going up again. However, Gov. Scott’s administration has determined that the selectboard or city council and local health officer need to ask permission to impose a mask mandate now that the emergency order is no longer in effect.

They could grant that authority and allow select boards and city councils to increase protection of their residents. The simple fact is, to date they have refused.

The administration could, in these uncertain times, grant local officials the authority to impose mask mandates at the local level when Covid transmission and caseloads in their communities warrant additional measures to assure public safety. Likewise, the Legislature could extend that authority to local governing bodies.

It is high time to provide the tools for towns to protect their residents.

Karen Horn,
Barre Director, public policy and advocacy, Vermont League of Cities and Towns

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Missing the mark on ed reform

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, If and when the governor and Legislature agree on something they call “transformational educational reform,” it’s unlikely to be what most people expected or wanted. Vermonters won’t see the property tax relief they were hoping for because changes to the funding system will be a few years off. Instead, the first sign of…

H.454: Another tax hike disguised as funding reform

June 11, 2025
By Ryan Heraty Editor’s note: Ryan Heraty is the superintendent of the Lamoille South Supervisory Union and a doctoral student at the University of Vermont, studying education finance and public policy. Most Vermonters agree our state is facing an affordability crisis, yet few suggest the solution is to raise taxes on low and middle-income Vermonters.…

CHIP is a game changer

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, Vermont just took a bold, historic step toward solving one of the most urgent issues facing our state: the lack of affordable and attainable homes for Vermonters of all income levels and backgrounds. With the passage of the Community Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP) during the 2025 legislative session, the state now has a…

Want lower taxes? Then let’s reform education the smart way

June 11, 2025
By Bryce Sammel Editor’s note: Bryce Sammel, of Barnard, previously served on and chaired both the Barnard Academy and Mountain Views school boards. Vermonters are rightly worried about taxes. With rising costs across the board, including property taxes, health care and energy bills, many residents, especially those without school-aged children, are asking a fair question:…