On June 2, 2021

Accessibility should be accessible

Dear Editor,

I recently learned that the Bennington Housing Authority no longer provides housing for people with a disability if they are under the age of 62 in their existing subsidized apartments. While “seniors” who no longer can age in place because of the architecture of our current homes will face slightly less competition for a scarce resource, the decision takes six subsidized, accessible apartments off the market for younger disabled Vermonters.

That might not sound like much, but there was already a severe shortage of affordable accessible housing in Vermont. This includes apartments with accessible bathrooms and wheel-in showers that people who use wheelchairs need to live independently and with dignity. 

This just makes the situation even worse.

Worse still, accessible and subsidized apartments simply do not become available very often. Once a person is lucky enough to acquire one they tend to stay there. There is a very long waiting list.

While the housing authority still offers Section 8 vouchers to younger applicants to allow them to live in the community, when younger disabled Vermonters do an apartment search, they will find a very limited number of units that are accessible.

Gus Seelig, director at the Vermont Housing Conservation Board, reportedly said that he expects hundreds of new housing units to be built with federal dollars. 

If so, how many will be accessible? 

I truly hope that the fiscal year 2022 budget appropriates funds to provide more much-needed affordable accessible housing that includes accessible bathrooms with wheel-in showers.

Everyone is entitled to a safe, accessible, and comfortable home. If you live with a disability, acquiring that housing should not be this steep an uphill battle. 

Charlie Murphy, Bennington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…