On April 21, 2021

Why I didn’t sign the relief bill

By Governor Phil Scott

Editor’s note: Governor Phil Scott announced April 17  that he will allow H. 315 to become law without his signature and issued the following letter to the General Assembly.

Pursuant to Chapter II, Section 11 of the Vermont Constitution, H.315, An Act Relating to Covid-19 Relief, will become law without my signature for the reasons stated herein.

H.315 started as a smart spending bill — about $62 million in total — to fund urgent pandemic needs, including business recovery grants that were a top priority in the budget adjustment proposal I proposed in January. The need was there in January and is still urgent today.

Over the two months it took the Legislature to pass H.315, it evolved into something much larger and more complex.

To the Legislature’s credit, the bill includes some valuable relief for Vermonters, including:

  • $47 million for budget initiatives I put forward, including economic aid to businesses, housing to immediately address emergency needs, brownfield remediation and environmental clean-up and VOREC community grants.
  • $5 million for foreclosure prevention.
  • $7.64 million for mental health services, recovery centers, New Americans, refugees and immigrants, and grants to Reach-Up participants.
  • Linking to federal income taxes for tax year 2020, which will exempt the first $10,200 of unemployment insurance income, as well as Paycheck Protection Program forgiven loan funds.

For these reasons, I’m allowing H.315 to become law.

Unfortunately, I cannot sign this bill because it includes policy and spending choices that suggest we have very different opinions about how best to deploy the federal recovery and economic stimulus funding.

As a result, I want to be clear:  I feel very strongly that we need to invest federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) money in a truly strategic and fully transparent way, preferably in a single piece of legislation. These investments should be in tangible infrastructure that provide the greatest economic benefits and will truly transform our economy – especially in the parts of the state that need it most. I will not support a piecemeal or diluted approach to the investment of ARPA funds.

We must not squander this unprecedented opportunity to transform the economy of our state. If we work together, we can make historic investments in climate change mitigation, water and sewer infrastructure, universal broad band, housing and more. All these investments, if planned and supported wisely, will be something we can point to as the silver-lining of this pandemic. We must not forgo the opportunity to maximize the benefit of this federal money simply because the federal timing did not align with the traditional legislative calendar or process. That would be profoundly shortsighted.

Similarly, I also feel strongly that the Legislature should reverse its decision to insert, at the last minute, a new and punitive tax liability on federal PPP loans. These forgivable loans were issued to help employers survive this pandemic and preserve jobs. And our businesses have applied for these loans with the understanding they would not be taxed. In addition, Senator Leahy’s office has confirmed that these resources were never intended to be taxed. The Legislature should be at their side, helping them up. Not on their back, trying to raise yet more in taxes.

I encourage the Legislature to take these concerns seriously — as they reflect core priorities that I will want to see reflected in the budget and other legislation as we move toward adjournment.

More specifically, rather than act quickly on H.315 with available state funds and federal Coronavirus Relief Funds — and without allowing for a transparent, tangible and transformative approach to investing $1 billion in federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds — the Legislature chose to hastily deploy $59 million of ARPA funds unnecessarily. The initiatives in H.315 are not bad investments, but they should not be funded with ARPA money. Again, we owe it to Vermonters to spend the ARPA funds in a transparent way, preferably through a single spending bill, so Vermonters can easily understand the investments and can verify that the Legislature is maximizing the value of every penny to strengthen the economy in every county and every community.

In addition to unnecessarily expending ARPA funds, H.315 also spends about $4 million in Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funds. Congress explicitly appropriated this money to the Vermont Agency of Education. In H.315, the Legislature added their approval as an additional requirement. This will prevent the Agency from moving quickly to meet the needs of our children. The fact is our kids are not doing okay in the hybrid learning environment and they should not have to wait for the Legislature’s appropriations process.

The need for flexibility should be apparent and the expertise and judgment of the professionals at the Agency ought to be respected, not micro-managed. I intend to use all the tools at my disposal to take advantage of these grants.

Again, I want to underscore how strongly I feel about the need for an agreement between the House, Senate, and the Administration on how to spend ARPA funds. This should come before any additional funds are expended. I also want to reiterate that I do not support deploying these funds in a piecemeal fashion across a hodgepodge of bills and programs. These funds are meant to expedite recovery, revitalize our economy, and make a difference in the lives of Vermonters well into the future. They are not to provide short-term, unsustainable band aids for complicated issues or plug ongoing budget holes.

In conclusion, because this bill contains urgently needed funds for Vermonters, I am allowing it to become law. But the Legislature should take note that I will not support any additional, unnecessary, or unwise use of ARPA or ESSER funding. I urge the Legislature to work with me to take a more collaborative, transparent, and strategic approach to allocating the remaining ARPA funds and maximizing the transformative economic benefits of these once-in-a-lifetime funds for Vermonters.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Celebrating 60 Years of the Food Stamp Act: Why SNAP must be protected for future generations

September 4, 2024
By Ivy Enoch Editor’s note: Ivy Enoch is SNAP policy and training lead for Hunger Free Vermont. As we mark the 60th anniversary of the Food Stamps Act, now known as SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) nationally and 3SquaresVT here in Vermont, it is crucial to recognize the profound impact this landmark legislation has had…

Working together to address Vermont’s health care challenges

September 4, 2024
Dear Editor, As Vermont’s population ages and in many places declines, we’re seeing the impact in all aspects of our daily lives — whether it’s housing, education or health care. What’s the core problem in Vermont’s health care system? At its most simple, the number of people paying for care through commercial insurance is going…

We have gained nothing from legalized sports betting

September 4, 2024
Dear Editor, In its first six months legalized sports betting brought $3.5 million dollars in tax revenue to the state of Vermont. Except that Vermonters and visitors bet more than $100 million in that time period and the casinos paid out less than 90%. So $10 million left our economy and we got a $3.5 million return,…

Your public forests are at risk, but you can help

September 4, 2024
Dear Editor, What was at first a peaceful and unassuming summer has now jolted Vermonters with another wave of midyear inundations. Many communities just beginning to get back on their feet from last year’s flooding have been forced back to square one. In the wake of these unfortunate circumstances, we are reminded that Vermont’s forests…