On January 15, 2025
Letters

Sen. Williams—we will not ‘get over it’

Dear Editor,

The new vice-chair of Senate Natural Resources, Terry Williams, kicked off the legislative session with a rude and dismissive response to a constituent’s concerns about trapping. A constituent wrote Williams a polite, lengthy email outlining various concerns with trapping—Williams’ response: “Get over it…” Sure, Williams lists trapping as one of his recreational pastimes on the Legislature’s website, but he must not place his personal agenda before the people he was elected to serve. Is Williams emboldened by similar hot-headed antics and partisan favoritism with the new lieutenant governor in office? Probably. I was the target of similar hostile treatment by Lt. Gov. John Rodgers when he sat on Senate Natural Resources.

Is this the Republican party that Phil Scott is proud of? For a governor who often talks about turning down the temperature and vitriol, he surely stands behind politicians who do the exact opposite.

I’ve sat in on countless committee hearings on both the House and Senate sides where the trapping issue has come up. Leaders, including former Senator Chris Bray (Democrat), were always inclusive, respectful, and fair when communicating with trapping lobbyists and trappers themselves. The same goes for the leadership in the House, where leadership would work with sportsmen’s lobbyists to accommodate their schedules, only for the lobbyists to accuse them of preferential treatment. Wildlife advocates cannot expect the same treatment from people like Williams.

The topic of trapping will never go away. Despite Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s desire to greenwash trapping by promoting so-called “best management practices” for trapping, the evidence of extreme suffering is obvious. A woman was walking her dog in Pownal on Dec 31, 2024, on a trail she’s enjoyed since childhood, only to have her dog painfully ensnared in a leghold trap. She and her partner could not remove the trap from her yelping dog and had to enlist help from a third person. When the dog was released and brought to the vet, it was determined that the dog had broken teeth with painful exposed tooth pulp and also soft tissue damage to the paw. The dog was only in the trap for 25 minutes. Imagine the injuries that wild animals like bobcats, coyotes, and foxes endure while trapped for a day or longer.

Various surveys reveal that the majority of Vermonters want to ban trapping, but due to Vermont Fish & Wildlife essentially operating as a lobbying arm for trappers, we are not surprised by their tone-deaf response to this reality. The University of Vermont’s Center for Rural Studies survey revealed that 75% of Vermonters who responded want to ban all leghold, kill, and drowning traps. Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s 2022 survey conducted by Responsive Management, a company that conducts surveys for state fish and game agencies, revealed that only 26% of Vermonters approve of trapping for recreation, which is the bulk of trapping performed during the legal season. Their survey also revealed that only 42% approved of trapping, and when asked if they support “regulated” trapping, they responded at 60% (the 60% figure is what they publicize). 

Approval of “regulated” trapping could mean that people approve of Fish & Wildlife having regulations that govern trapping, not that they approve of trapping as an activity.  The survey has been accused of using persuasive and craftily worded questions to elicit a desired response. Despite that, the answers still reveal that trapping is not well-supported by Vermoters, even when greenwashing efforts are attempted. 

In addition, when the Vermont Veterinary Medical Association conducted a survey, 66% did not approve of traps, even those under the guise of “best management practices” approved traps. 

Retired veterinarian Dr. Peggy Larson has repeatedly stated, “As a veterinarian, I have treated cats and dogs caught in traps—most required amputation of the affected limb. The tissue damage was extensive and infected. Some dogs had broken teeth from biting at the trap.”

Let’s pull the proverbial band-aid off. Not until Vermont bans the leg-hold traps will Fish & Wildlife and the legislature rest. The Vermont public will continue to demand that these indiscriminate land mines that are responsible for such senseless and torturous suffering be banned just as other states including Colorado and Arizona have done.

Senator Williams, we will not “get over it.”

Brenna Galdenzi, Stowe 

Brenna Galdenzi is the President of Protect Our Wildlife Vt.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The great housing development divide

January 22, 2025
The State of Vermont is one of the biggest housing developers in the state. Seven state departments qualify as housing developers, and the University of Vermont is a housing developer. Seven public housing authorities also qualify as housing developers. Add to the list the seven homeownership organizations that are housing developers, and then there are…

The 3 Hs — housing, hunger and health care

January 22, 2025
By Bill Schubart Editor’s note: Bill Schubart is a retired businessman and active fiction writer, and was a former chair of the Vermont Journalism Trust, the parent organization for VTDigger.  The latest statewide count for unsheltered Vermonters is 3,458, a nearly 5% increase over 2023, the second highest rate in the country, and this is deemed…

Finding common ground amid uncertainty

January 22, 2025
Dear Editor,  As a resident of St. Johnsbury, I regularly hike up Observatory Knob. A half mile from my home, I get to walk through woods and meadows to a summit with panoramic views. The 117-acre conserved land features forests, open fields, and benches to rest — just a short walk from where people live.…

Vermont’s population growth: why it matters

January 22, 2025
Dear Editor, A thriving, prosperous state is a goal that all Vermonters can agree to. That goal is easier to achieve with a growing population. More people means a larger selection of workers for businesses, government, and non-profits. It means more people earning incomes, supporting local businesses, and paying taxes to support government programs—many of…