On July 28, 2016

Lodging health and safety regulations should apply to all

Dear Editor,

The Vermont Inn and Bed & Breakfast Association brought to my attention on July 19 a consideration from the Vermont Department of Health that would compartmentalize lodging accommodations by size (the number of guest rooms) when it comes to the application of the department’s recently revised health and safety regulations. I do not know all of what’s proposed, but I have gleaned that accommodations of fewer than three rooms may in the future be exempted from meeting the standards the state sets to assure the safety and health of guests.

States the association: “Ironically, one and two bedroom units as it currently stands would be the largest lodging block as a health and safety risk for Vermont tourists as they would be the entities with no formal regulation process in place.”

I am writing to request that any accommodation of any size be required to adhere to the values reflected by a commitment to health and safety to which The Fan House B&B in Barnard, a three-bedroom accommodation, has adhered for the past 13 years. I have happily obliged these regulations outlined by the state and in so doing have assured my guests that they are staying at an accommodation that is safe, clean and food-healthy.

The responsibility of continuing to adhere to regulations, however, should not be a numbers game the state of Vermont plays. A one-bedroom facility should also be asked to adhere to appropriate standards.

Should undue stress regulations-wise be placed on me as the owner of a three-bedroom facility, I will remove myself from the three-bedroom category and simply become a one or two-bedroom facility.

The net result to the state would be fewer reservations and therefore fewer rooms and meals tax dollars that the Fan House pays.

Thank you for adhering to the concept of fairness and to an ongoing commitment to the well-being of visitors to Vermont.

Sara Widness, The Fan House, Barnard, Vt.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…