On June 7, 2016

Charges should be dropped against Mosher

Dear Editor,

The criminal charges filed by the Rutland State’s Attorneys Office against Mr. Mosher are overreaching and should be totally dropped. An involuntary manslaughter charge (felony) against the responsible owner of a cow killed by a car—in light of strong facts suggesting fault may lie with the auto driver—seems very unreasonable.

As a Killington property owner, I urge Attorney General Sorrell to personally investigate this matter and use his skills to craft a reasonable solution—including one that instructs the State’s Attorney who filed the case to drop all the charges.

Why? Craig Mosher acts, and acted, in a practical and reasonable manner with respect to managing his livestock. As someone who drives by his location on more or less a daily basis between October and May each year, I find that the street lighting is bright and the fences and animals are well kept.

More importantly, Mr. Mosher is a local business owner and hero.

Simply put, punishing a leader and economic creator after losing his cow to a car driven by a third party at a high speed is inconsistent with Vermont values.

In fact, Mr. Mosher really knows Vermont values. During the aftermath of Hurricane Irene, for example, without the tireless services of Mr. Mosher, Killington would have spent even more than the three weeks with no road access via Route 4 in and out of town. Mr. Mosher and his team can be seen fixing roads and bridges daily in the Killington region.

Please note, I have never met Mr. Mosher personally. After following his case in the media, I decided to reach out due to the serious charges brought by the State’s Attorneys Office.

Finally, as a fellow lawyer with material courtroom and educational experiences (i.e. successfully concluding a case in front of Chief Judge Christina Reis in Rutland Federal Court and educational training at the Vermont Law School and Cornell University), the charges here far exceed the facts and circumstances.

Accordingly, the case should be dropped.

Respectfully submitted, Gabriel M. Selig, Esq. (Cornell University Class of 1989), Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…