On March 12, 2025
Letters

Who is “affordability” for?

Dear Editor,

For better or worse, the word “affordability” is the new buzzword. It is all over the news and in the public sphere. It was all over the campaign trail and the governor and our Legislature mention it in practically every other sentence. While this is a great thing, something we all should be talking about, and should have been a long time ago, no one has yet said what affordability is and who it is supposed to be for. 

We all probably have a general conception of it. As usual, this depends on one’s status within the economic pyramid. What is “affordable” to a millionaire is not “affordable” to a working person at $15 or $20 an hour, with the usual taxes extracted from their paychecks every week, their labor enriching the millionaires and helping to fill the federal and state’s treasury. 

So what is “affordability?” Who is it for? Who is eligible for it in our society of “eligibility requirements?” Is it low taxes for the rich while more and more of the taxes necessary to run our state and country get shifted onto the middle and working classes, which has been the trend of our disastrous experiment in neoliberalism? 

What do we mean by affordable housing? Affordable health care? We seem to know what is “unaffordable,” for both of these dire necessities, and so many others, but we have never defined what is affordable for them. Who would determine what is affordable and what is not and for whom? Will there be an “affordability” commission to study what is affordable and what is not to make recommendations that may or may not be acted on in the next biennium? 

Maybe someday we should at least clarify what we mean by “affordability” and determine who it is intended for before we proclaim it as our new buzzword. 

Walter Carpenter, Montpelier

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…