On February 26, 2025
Opinions

Vote ‘yes’ for a five-member Select Board (Article 6)

Dear Editor,

The time has come for Killington to move to a five-member Select Board. This change will bring numerous benefits to our community and help us better manage the demands of a growing town.

A five-member board will reduce the need for special meetings by allowing the Select Board to create smaller committees of two members to research and work on special projects. 

These committees can then report to the full board for discussion and/or decision. 

Currently, any time two members get together, it constitutes a quorum, which requires a special meeting to be warned. This can be cumbersome and inefficient.

Select Board members also serve on the board of civil authority (BCA), working alongside the Justices of the Peace and Town Clerk to conduct elections and hear tax appeals. 

During the 2011 Reappraisal, the BCA received over 200 tax appeals. Since 2011, the BCA has consistently received two or more annual tax appeals. 

At times, BCA members must recuse themselves due to conflicts of interest, leaving fewer members to handle these responsibilities. 

Additionally, BCA members play a crucial role in election night duties, including ballot counting and working as ballot clerks. The more members we have available, the faster and more efficiently we can complete these tasks.

With all the current and future projects contributing to the growth of our town—such as the Killington Road reconstruction, the building of municipal water infrastructure, the development of workforce/affordable housing, and the Six Peaks Ski Village— a five-member board would offer diverse perspectives and better representation for all our residents.

While some have argued that Killington is too small for a five-member board or that it’s difficult to find enough citizens interested in serving, it’s clear that the town’s needs have outgrown these concerns. Killington may only have 1,407 year-round residents (according to the 2020 census), but we also serve thousands of second-home owners. While they may not be able to vote in local elections, they contribute to the town’s needs and deserve strong representation. 

A five-member board will provide better service to everyone in Killington.

Please join us on March 4 in voting “Yes” on Article 6.

Thank you,

Ken and Lucrecia Wonsor, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Audit needed in Killington?

May 28, 2025
Dear Editor, Someone should advocate for a town auditor given the constant rumors of ethical lapses and financial irregularities. Vito Rasenas, Killington

School spending

May 28, 2025
Dear Editor, All of this school spending, better referred to as overspending, is now coming home to roost. Had there been corresponding results in outcomes, there may have been different mindsets to be under discussion. Remember now, the voters went to the polls and spoke loudly and clearly on the education money issues that are…

Education reform: Trust Vermont values

May 28, 2025
By David F. Kelley Editor’s Note: David Kelley is a Vermont attorney. He lives in Greensboro and is a former chair of the Hazen Union School Board. He was part of the legal team that represented more than two dozen rural elementary school districts that appealed forced mergers under Act 46. The road to education…

Raising the bar for ethics in Killington

May 23, 2025
Dear Editor, As a candidate for the Killington Select Board, I’m running on a commitment to transparency, accountability, and steady leadership. I believe that trust in local government begins with clear standards and clear enforcement. Killington’s current conflict of interest policy, adopted in 2019, provides a useful foundation. However, it lacks the tools to ensure…