On December 26, 2024
Opinions

Balancing public interests in wildlife policy

Dear Editor,

Let’s look at the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Board and Department and tell me if it needs modernizing. And for those unaware, the Board is a 14-member volunteer group comprising hunters, trappers, hound hunters, and anglers from every county. The Board makes public policy decisions on our shared public wildlife without fair representation from the Vermont public. 

There are a lot of double standards when it comes to Fish & Wildlife regulations. They tell us not to feed wildlife but allow hunters to set out bait piles to attract coyotes, bobcats, and other animals for sport, even on public land.  They tell dog owners to keep their dogs leashed but allow hound hunters to unleash packs of hunting hounds that run miles away from the hunter in pursuit of bears, coyotes, bobcats, and other wildlife. This has created dangerous conflicts with landowners, motorists, and the general public. 

Fish & Wildlife refuses to change the land-posting requirements, forcing landowners to file and pay a fee to their town yearly, walk their land, and post an approved sign every 400 feet. Other states have adopted a “Purple Paint” law that is a one-time, no-fee task. Vermont’s current draconian law makes it nearly impossible for Vermonters to post their land to keep hunters off legally.  For an older person or someone with a physical disability, it’s even more challenging to post land. And for those who DO successfully post their land, packs of hunting hounds trespass every year since the hounds can’t read posted signs. Landowners have few rights and are held hostage to privileged special interest groups. Hunters should be required to ask permission before hunting someone’s private property. That would solve the problem!

Despite the science, Fish & Wildlife allows coyote hunting for sport, with no limit, all year, day and night. Coyotes maintain stable populations regardless of human intervention and are not a threat to native wildlife. Studies have shown that hunting them increases populations and fractures the fragile social pack hierarchy, which can create conflicts with humans.

They allow the use of steel jaw leghold, body-gripping, and drowning traps, even on public land. Traps are indiscriminate and are responsible for injuring/killing protected and endangered species, as well as dogs and cats. Why are they still legal?

They tout the importance of science but then ignore their science to accommodate their “customers” — license-holders.  A great example is that their studies recently revealed that 100% of fishers, a vital predator species, were poisoned by rodenticides. Yet, they still allow these animals to be trapped for recreation without bag limits.  

Please speak up for wildlife and hold those in power accountable to the people and our cherished wildlife, not privileged interests. 

Dean Percival, New Haven

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Homeless legislation encounters Sturm and Drang

May 7, 2025
A cohort of Vermont’s social service providers has embarked on an editorial campaign challenging the House’s recent legislation that would disrupt the status quo of homeless services funding administration. Angus Chaney, executive director of Rutland’s Homeless Prevention Center (HPC), appears to be the author of the editorial and is joined by about a dozen fellow…

From incarceration to community care: Reinvest in health, justice, common good

May 7, 2025
By Brian Cina Editor’s note: Brian Cina is a VermontState Representative for Chittenden-15. Cina is a clinical social worker with a full-time therapy practice and is a part-time crisis clinician. State-sanctioned punishment and violence perpetuate harm under the guise of accountability, justice, and public safety. Since 2017, Governor Phil Scott has pushed for new prisons…

Tech, nature are out of synch

May 7, 2025
Dear Editor, I have been thinking since Earth Day about modern technology and our environment and how much they are out of touch with each other.  Last summer, my wife and I traveled to Fairbanks, Alaska, for a wedding. While there, we went to the Museum of the North at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks. It…

Under one roof: Vermont or bust!

May 7, 2025
Dear Editor, We’re heading north and so excited. We’re moving full time to Vermont! For decades we’ve been snow birds, like my parents, spending half the year in Bradenton, Florida. But now our Florida house is up for sale — a 1929 Spanish Mediterranean brimming with beauty and charm. A young family we hope will…