On October 16, 2024
Opinions

Unchecked trapping: The unseen threat to Vermont’s fisher

Dear Editor, 

Unchecked trapping poses a serious and largely unnoticed threat to Vermont’s imperiled fisher population. It shouldn’t have to come to this. Why does it take Protect Our Wildlife (POW), an all-volunteer Vermont nonprofit, to petition Vermont Fish & Wildlife to get them to protect Vermont’s imperiled wildlife? Fish & Wildlife is well aware that the fisher population is in danger due to rodenticide poisoning and other threats. However, they still allow a recreational trapping season with no limit on the number of animals that may be killed. According to their own data, the population is trending downward.

The Fish & Wildlife furbearer biologist Brehan Furfey testified before the Senate Agriculture Committee in Feb.2024 concerning rodenticide, stating that all fisher samples tested positive for rodenticide poisoning. Despite this, in addition to the recreational trapping season, Fish & Wildlife allows year-round killing of fisher and other animals labeled as “furbearer” species under the dangerously permissive “wild animals causing damage” statute, title 10 V.S.A. §4828. Unchecked trapping only compounds the existing threats to this species. 

A POW Board member, who also has a Masters in Conservation Biology, spent the last few months analyzing data and took a deep dive into the issue. She shared her findings in a report she submitted to the Fish & Wildlife Dept. and Board (shared on Fish & Wildlife’s website). There is no green-washing the issue: 100% of fisher recently sampled tested positive for rodenticide poisoning.

The fisher (Pekania pennanti) is a carnivorous forest-dwelling mammal native to North America. It is a member of the Mustelid (weasel) family and is closely related to the American marten, an endangered species in Vermont. 

Traps set for fisher also place protected marten in direct danger, which is another reason to stop the unchecked trapping of fisher. A trap set for fisher cannot differentiate between the intended target and a look-alike species, the marten.

Fisher are a vital predator species who perform an outsized role of keeping small mammal and rodent populations in check. They are an essential contributor to healthy ecosystems. There is no biological imperative to kill them. There is, however, empirical evidence to protect them.

The petition hearing is on Wednesday, Oct. 16, at 5 p.m. 

Will Fish & Wildlife seek to downplay the threats and obfuscate an apparent decline in population, or will they take this opportunity to reach across the aisle and do what is right?

For more info, visit:
ProtectOurWildlifeVT.org.

Brenna Galdenzi, Stowe

Editor’s note: Galdenzi is the president of Protect Our Wildlife, a Vermont-based advocacy group.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…