On August 14, 2024
Opinions

Why Kennedy in ’24?  Physics

Dear Editor,

A third party always challenges the dual-mode of the scales, up and down. The dual-mode (“two party system”) has dominated America since John Adams was president. Picture a fist fight. Dramatic, sure. Useful? To vested interests, very. You get the drama. Vested interests pocket the dharma: the money and influence. The power. 

The same John Adams was a principal American political system architect, and the “two party” thing wasn’t part of it. In fact, he bent Franklin’s arm so that we’d have a senate, which effectively serves as a third body (senate, congress, and executive) to help defeat the very statics that the “two party system” causes (after the drama — read Thomas Carlyle).  It is either one of the two scales weighing the other down (Democrats or Republicans). A third party turns scales into merry-go-rounds, such that one scale end doesn’t cause the other to dangle in the air, deadlocked (where the one on the ground laughs, “Ha! Ha! Ha!”).  You’ll get three scales as they bounce around. They never touch the ground. 

Translated to politics, that means all three danglers must communicate, since none can dominate. Talk, compromise, or die — politically. To stifle compromise even more, politicos invented filibusters to introduce partisan statics to hold the other side hostage, short term. 

Let’s see how long the Democrats or Republicans can hold their breaths for four years if Kennedy is elected.   

Despite Adams’ political hardware, politicians have found ways to turn two legislative houses and a president’s office into a scale. It is strictly the software on the hardware creating this monstrous scalar mess. There is nothing structural, constitutionally, to it, at all. It causes deadlock. This is terrific for vested interests; bad for you. 

A third party president — not being a slave to those parties, so thus, letting principle  be their master — would effectively force the majority members of the two party “system” (the duopoly)  to the table. 

Being at heart a man of principle — howsoever flawed — Kennedy will tell them what he wants at the table. 

And they’ll have to deliver. They won’t have any national or state committees to hide behind or audiences to entertain at the fist fight. There won’t be any. They’ll be clearly seen shaking hands across aisles too.

Who knows? Kennedy being the first independent president since Washington might peacefully move America to a third, even better, republic, without civil war. 

Steven Yaskell,
Mount Holly

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Closing schools doesn’t fix Vermont’s education affordibility problems

October 30, 2024
By Margaret MacLean Editor’s note: Margaret MacLean, of Peacham, is a retired Vermont teacher and award-winning principal. She is the founding executive director of the Vermont Rural Education Collaborative, a past employee of the Rural School and Community Trust, and served on the Vermont State Board of Education.  Roxbury parents can meet most of the…

Making Vermont a place working families want to call home

October 30, 2024
By Rebecca Holcombe Editor’s note: Rebecca Holcombe is a Vermont Representative from Windsor-Orange 2 who served as the Vermont Secretary of Education from 2014 to 2018. Vermonters suffer from unsustainable increases in the cost of everything from property taxes to healthcare. Too many people are working hard and stretching Social Security checks but still worry…

Don’t be fooled by false promises

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor,  There is no simple solution to the challenges that Vermonters face. There needs to be a delicate balance between what, on the surface, seems like appealing short-term solutions to the cost of living for all Vermonters versus the vision for long-term planning that creates financial stability and growth into the future.  Do not…

Context matters

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor, In an October 23 letter to the Mountain Times, Steve Berry wrote, “John Kerry stated at a World Economic Forum panel, ‘Our First Amendment stands as a major block (to getting things done).’”  You may wonder why Mr. Berry uses such odd syntax, placing part of the quote in parentheses. Maybe it’s because…