On August 7, 2024
Opinions

2024’s accidental election innovation: a shorter campaign

By Madeleine Kunin

Editor’s note: Madeleine Kunin served as the 77th governor of Vermont from 1985-1991. 

Just about every article about the Harris/Trump presidential campaign emphasizes how little time we have left until Election Day: fewer than 100 days. The authors of these stories see these few days as a crisis, a disadvantage or at least a major problem to be overcome.

I disagree. I think a shorter presidential campaign is a great advantage — for both parties. Remember the old days of 2020 and even farther back? We got sick of the campaigns. We got bored. We changed the channel when we could. The campaign ads we had to watch were the “same old, same old.” We had a hard time paying attention. And think of the money spent.

What a contrast 2024 has become. We are experiencing something new. We’re actually paying attention to the campaigns by both parties. By sheer accident — because President Biden stepped down and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris later than usual — we’re doing what most democracies do: have three-month or even shorter election campaigns.

Admittedly, some of the excitement is caused by the possibility that Harris may be the first woman president in American history.

But our attention span is longer and deeper than that. A short campaign holds our attention. Attention is a quality of mind that both candidates desperately want to achieve from the audience. That is the best way to win over a voter.

Who knows? Shorter campaigns might become a habit. I, for one, would be happy.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…