On May 29, 2024
Opinions

Gov. Scott’s veto of the landmark renewable energy billis short-sighted

Dear Editor,

In a dismaying attempt to obstruct Vermont’s environmental and economic progress, Governor Scott vetoed compromise legislation aimed at modernizing the Renewable Energy Standard and setting the state on a path to delivering 100% renewable electricity by 2035. 

By vetoing H.289, which was supported by nearly all of the state’s electric utilities, along with a host of environmental organizations, business groups and others, Governor Scott is again jeopardizing our state’s progress in clean energy and needed climate action as well as threatening to curtail a needed clean energy jobs sector. To override the governor’s veto, the Legislature must vote with a 2/3rds majority at the veto session in mid-June. 

This landmark legislation would be the first major update to the Renewable Energy Standard in nearly a decade and would represent the most significant action Vermont has ever taken to cut carbon pollution in the electric sector. This bill, if enacted, would have Vermont be the second state in the nation to achieve 100% renewable electricity, setting a precedent for clean energy progress and economic innovation. By increasing the requirements for utilities to support new renewable energy projects in the region and the state, H.289 would significantly cut carbon pollution — equivalent to removing up to 250,000 cars from our roads permanently by 2035.

“This bill was the result of a months-long stakeholder process that brought together for the first time environmental groups, business interests and utilities to craft a common sense compromise to get Vermont away from fossil fuels and onto 100% renewable energy. By vetoing this bi-partisan bill, Governor Scott has once again said to Vermonters he is not interested in tackling the climate crisis we are facing,” said Peter Sterling, executive director of Renewable Energy Vermont. 

“Governor Scott has chosen to side with fossil fuel interests over the health and wellbeing of Vermonters,” said Lauren Hierl, executive director of Vermont Conservation Voters. “Vermont has the chance to lead the nation in renewable energy innovation and climate action, and we hope the legislature overturns this misguided veto.”

“The benefits of H.289 are clear,” said Johanna Miller, climate and energy program director at Vermont Natural Resources Council. “Instead, the governor’s action leaves Vermont vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, dependent on outdated, polluting energy sources and curbs much-needed clean energy job growth.” 

“Vermonters have made clear over and over again that addressing the climate crisis must be a priority, and that the status quo is simply unacceptable,” said Ben Edgerly Walsh, climate and energy program director for VPIRG. 

“Vermonters remember too well last summer’s devastating flood and smoky skies from Canadian fires. Instead of taking action, Governor Scott has chosen to veto our safety, health, and future,” said Vanessa Rule, Co-Director and Lead Organizer of 350VT.  This veto does not reflect the will of the people.” 

Supporters of H.289 will be calling on legislators to vote to override this short-sighted veto. H.289 passed the Vermont House 99-39 and passed the Senate 18-8. With two-thirds votes needed in each chamber to override the veto, the bill has a path to enactment. 

It is imperative that the Legislature override this veto. For the sake of our environment, our economy, and future generations, we call on lawmakers to act to override the governor’s veto of H.289 and uphold needed clean energy progress for Vermont. 

Peter Sterling, Renewable Energy Vermont.

Lauren Hierl, Vermont Conservation Voters

Johanna Miller, Vermont Natural Resources Council

Ben Edgerly Walsh, Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG)

Vanessa Rule, 350VT

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Clean Heat Standard is just too expensive

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, In last week’s article by James Kent, “House Republicans mull a plan to repeal the environmental Clean Heat Standard,” he incorrectly suggests the cost impact on heating fuel is only a couple of cents per gallon, citing a report by Energy Futures. We wish that were true, but unfortunately it is not. Act…

Affordability and a healthy environment can coexist

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, As 2024 draws to a close, I resolve to start the new year with optimism and determination to protect what we care about. Our shared connection to the natural world lies at the heart of Vermont’s identity. We love the beauty and bounty of our state. We also know that a healthy environment…

Let’s welcome asylum seekers

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, Picture a young woman, nine months pregnant, compelled by forces beyond her control to leave home and make an arduous journey with her betrothed to a foreign land, unsure of their welcome there. At this time of year, most of us raised in the Christian tradition would pretty immediately, if unconsciously, imagine this…

Balancing public interests in wildlife policy

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, Let’s look at the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Board and Department and tell me if it needs modernizing. And for those unaware, the Board is a 14-member volunteer group comprising hunters, trappers, hound hunters, and anglers from every county. The Board makes public policy decisions on our shared public wildlife without fair representation…