On May 8, 2024
Opinions

Act 127 made progress;but Excess Spending Threshold could undermine it

Dear Editor,

As the Chair of the Burlington School District (BSDVT) School Board, I am fortunate to witness firsthand the profound impact of educational policies on our diverse community. Among these policies, Act 127 stands out as a beacon of progress in our continuous effort to achieve equity and finally address the inequity across Vermont’s schools. 

However, while we navigate the benefits of such transformative legislation, we also face potential challenges that could undermine our efforts, such as the discussions around the Excess Spending Threshold.

Act 127 was a significant milestone passed with the intent to rectify the longstanding disparities in educational funding. By recalibrating the funding formula to more accurately reflect the needs of today’s students—particularly those in economically disadvantaged or culturally diverse districts like ours—it promises to level the playing field. This act is crucial for Burlington, where our student population is incredibly diverse, with 63% of our students facing basic needs challenges as well as New Americans who bring a wealth of culture but also face unique educational challenges.

The success of Act 127 in promoting equity is something to be celebrated and protected. As such, while there is talk of reinstating the Excess Spending Threshold—a policy that could restrict the ability of districts to spend beyond a certain limit—I urge caution. It is essential that any modifications to financial policies are considered through the lens of their long-term impact on educational equity. The Excess Spending Threshold, if not handled carefully, could potentially penalize those it was designed to protect by capping necessary funding in districts that are just beginning to find their footing with the passage of Act 127.

Indeed, financial prudence is vital, and we must ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. However, we must also recognize that the path to equity is multifaceted. It involves understanding the unique needs of each district and ensuring that they have the resources to meet these needs. As we discuss the Excess Spending Threshold, let’s ensure that our decisions do not inadvertently halt the progress we are making towards a more equitable educational landscape.

I believe in a Vermont where every child has access to quality education that meets their specific needs, regardless of their background or where they live. Act 127 has started us on this path with modernized pupil weights and an equitable funding formula. As we move forward, let’s continue to champion policies that uphold this vision and approach changes like the Excess Spending Threshold with a careful, equity-focused perspective.

Let’s work together—legislators, educators, and community members—to maintain the momentum towards true educational equity. It’s a goal worth pursuing with both passion and caution, ensuring that all Vermont students have the opportunity to succeed in a supportive and fair learning environment.  Respectfully, 

Clare K. Wool, Burlington

Editor’s note: Clare Wool is the chairperson of the Burlington School Board.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…