On April 17, 2024
Opinions

NAR Settlement: What it means for home buyers and sellers in Vermont

By Steven Foster

Editor’s note: Steven Foster is president of the Vermont Association of Realtors, a statewide association of over 2,000 real estate practitioners.

On March 15, 2024, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) announced a $418 million settlement that would resolve litigation over claims in a national class action lawsuit brought on by home sellers related to broker’s commissions. Much of the reporting surrounding this and what it means for the Vermont housing market has been inaccurate.

It’s important to note that NAR does not set commissions or fees, and the proposed settlement would not change that. Realtors’ professional service fees would continue to be negotiable among buyers, sellers, and their brokers. Sellers and buyers may decide to work with a Realtor for many reasons, including helping to understand local market conditions, interpreting information found on the internet, negotiating the best price and terms, and navigating an often complex financing and closing process.

Highly trained real estate professionals offer client advocacy and insights with required disclosures and regulations. They connect buyers and sellers with other reputable real estate-related professionals such as lawyers, lenders, contractors, and inspectors — any of which can make or break a transaction.

The commitment of Vermont Realtors to their clients and the value they deliver have not wavered through market cycles and other industry changes. NAR’s settlement is simply an attempt to increase communication and transparency in an ever-evolving real estate industry. The settlement would preserve consumers’ choices regarding real estate services and compensation. 

NAR and the Vermont Association of Realtors (VAR) have long encouraged their members to use written representation agreements because these help consumers understand exactly what services and value will be provided and at what cost. While this practice has not been universally adopted across the U.S., we are proud to say that it has been in place in Vermont for many decades. Compensation will continue to be negotiable and should always be negotiated between real estate brokerages and the consumers they serve.

Many news stories focus on how the proposed changes in the settlement will make homes more affordable. This perspective fails to consider the most basic tenet of economics: supply and demand. The increase in home prices can be attributed to interest rates, inflation, and the lack of Inventory. Vermont currently has a 6,800-unit housing shortage. Naturally, when few properties are available, the high demand from buyers causes prices to rise.

Ultimately, consumers will continue to be able to choose the real estate professional they want to work with and, through a written agreement, determine how much and how they will pay for that expertise, value, and guidance. NAR’s proposed settlement and the associated practice changes will not change what makes Realtors incredibly valuable: specialized knowledge, diligence, advocacy, and fiduciary responsibility to their buyer and seller clients.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…