On January 24, 2024
Letters

The cost of an inaccurate enrollment forecast

Dear Editor,

I am concerned about the upcoming community decision on the proposed new middle and high school. The plan is based on a model that is out-of-sync with recent enrollment trends and future projections. Since education funding in Vermont is based on enrollment, it is a critical element of any funding plan. Indeed, the School Board’s hope to increase students in grades 7-12 from the current 452 to 700 has been highlighted in presentations as a way to help fund the school and keep tax rates from skyrocketing. But if their growth projections do not occur, our already high taxes will rise beyond affordability for most people.

How likely is this desired increase in enrollment to come to fruition? The enrollment trajectory at Woodstock Union over recent decades and forecasts on the impact of decreased birthrates on school-age populations can help answer this. Enrollment in FY2001 dropped from 721 students, to 663 in FY2004, to 511 in Oct 2020 (the peak of the Covid “bump”), to 486 in Oct 2021, and is now 452 in January 2024. Applying a U.S. Department of Education projection of an 11.2% drop in Vermont statewide enrollment between 2021 and 2030 (reported in nesdec.org), enrollment would be down to 432 by 2030.

I fully appreciate the importance of public education, support investment in education, and support a major project to address the school’s obvious needs. But the choice that we must make must be based on actual needs (enrollment) and resources (tax base). I am worried that the planning has been based on a laudable optimism but is not realistic. We must live within our means while we invest in education, ensuring the health of the community in every way.

Sincerely,

Pamela Fraser

Former WCUUSD School Board member; parent, and WUHS Class of 2023

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Gov. Phil Scott, we’ve never needed you more, where are you?

July 2, 2025
Dear Editor, I was scheduled to be the final speaker at the “No Kings” rally in Burlington last week. Unfortunately, the event ran longer than anticipated, and I was not able to address the crowd. Here’s what I had planned to say:  Good afternoon. My name is Larry Satcowitz. I’m a state representative from Randolph.…

Protecting SNAP protects farmers

July 2, 2025
Dear Editor, As the director of the Burlington Farmers Market I am deeply concerned about what’s happening in Congress right now and the potential to gut Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid, two of the most essential programs that help people put food on the table and get the healthcare they need. At our…

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…