On January 24, 2024
Letters

The cost of an inaccurate enrollment forecast

Dear Editor,

I am concerned about the upcoming community decision on the proposed new middle and high school. The plan is based on a model that is out-of-sync with recent enrollment trends and future projections. Since education funding in Vermont is based on enrollment, it is a critical element of any funding plan. Indeed, the School Board’s hope to increase students in grades 7-12 from the current 452 to 700 has been highlighted in presentations as a way to help fund the school and keep tax rates from skyrocketing. But if their growth projections do not occur, our already high taxes will rise beyond affordability for most people.

How likely is this desired increase in enrollment to come to fruition? The enrollment trajectory at Woodstock Union over recent decades and forecasts on the impact of decreased birthrates on school-age populations can help answer this. Enrollment in FY2001 dropped from 721 students, to 663 in FY2004, to 511 in Oct 2020 (the peak of the Covid “bump”), to 486 in Oct 2021, and is now 452 in January 2024. Applying a U.S. Department of Education projection of an 11.2% drop in Vermont statewide enrollment between 2021 and 2030 (reported in nesdec.org), enrollment would be down to 432 by 2030.

I fully appreciate the importance of public education, support investment in education, and support a major project to address the school’s obvious needs. But the choice that we must make must be based on actual needs (enrollment) and resources (tax base). I am worried that the planning has been based on a laudable optimism but is not realistic. We must live within our means while we invest in education, ensuring the health of the community in every way.

Sincerely,

Pamela Fraser

Former WCUUSD School Board member; parent, and WUHS Class of 2023

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Addressing affordability: Why fossil fuels are not the answer

January 29, 2025
Dear Editor, Nearly all Vermonters agree we want living in our state to be more affordable. When it comes to energy, continued dependence on high-cost and price-volatile fossil fuels like gasoline, fuel oil, and propane is not a path to affordability. In 2023, $2.2 billion was spent on fossil fuels for transportation and heating in…

Unaffordable Housing I:Rent-fixing

January 29, 2025
Dear Editor, Back in February 2024, Vermont Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) introduced a bill, “Preventing Algorithmic Facilitation of Rental Housing Cartels.” What does the bill’s name translate to in plain English? Rent-fixing. In a press release dated Aug. 23, 2024, the U.S. Dept.  of Justice (DOJ) announced it, along with…

Finding common ground amid uncertainty

January 22, 2025
Dear Editor,  As a resident of St. Johnsbury, I regularly hike up Observatory Knob. A half mile from my home, I get to walk through woods and meadows to a summit with panoramic views. The 117-acre conserved land features forests, open fields, and benches to rest — just a short walk from where people live.…

Vermont’s population growth: why it matters

January 22, 2025
Dear Editor, A thriving, prosperous state is a goal that all Vermonters can agree to. That goal is easier to achieve with a growing population. More people means a larger selection of workers for businesses, government, and non-profits. It means more people earning incomes, supporting local businesses, and paying taxes to support government programs—many of…