On October 18, 2023

Be aware of the disadvantages of Medicare Advantage 

 

Dear Editor,

We’re being overwhelmed with advertising for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, but there are no ads for traditional Medicare. The reason for the MA ads is that the Medicare Advantage corporations are making huge profits.

Medicare Advantage is privatizing Medicare. When you sign on for Medicare Advantage you are giving your Medicare dollars to an insurance company to do with as they please. MA programs advertise their low or $0 premiums but don’t mention that there are significant co-pays when you access health care services. With MA plans, you are confined to providers in the plan’s network, prior-authorizations are required for many tests, procedures and services. These delay the care you need, and in many cases outright deny payment altogether, even though your doctors ordered the treatment.  

I chose Traditional Medicare parts A and B and bought an additional supplement (medigap) and a Medicare Drug Plan. The cost of these Medicare Supplemental plans varies, but usually adds up to about $175 for both the supplement and Medicare Drug Plan. With this coverage, I can receive care from all Medicare providers in the U.S., and not worry about prior approvals or denials or delays in care and treatment. I’m confident that I am well covered for my senior years, with decisions about my health made by my doctor and me, not some employee at a Medicare Advantage company that makes more money if I don’t get the care I may need. 

Dr. Marvin Malek detailed the many drawbacks to MA plans earlier this year in an OPED titled “State workers — and the rest of us — should resist Medicare ‘Advantage.’” You can read it here: Tinyurl.com/NoMedicareAdvantage.

Linda Andrews, BSN, NP in Women’s Health Care, MPH

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…