On October 18, 2023

Be aware of the disadvantages of Medicare Advantage 

 

Dear Editor,

We’re being overwhelmed with advertising for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, but there are no ads for traditional Medicare. The reason for the MA ads is that the Medicare Advantage corporations are making huge profits.

Medicare Advantage is privatizing Medicare. When you sign on for Medicare Advantage you are giving your Medicare dollars to an insurance company to do with as they please. MA programs advertise their low or $0 premiums but don’t mention that there are significant co-pays when you access health care services. With MA plans, you are confined to providers in the plan’s network, prior-authorizations are required for many tests, procedures and services. These delay the care you need, and in many cases outright deny payment altogether, even though your doctors ordered the treatment.  

I chose Traditional Medicare parts A and B and bought an additional supplement (medigap) and a Medicare Drug Plan. The cost of these Medicare Supplemental plans varies, but usually adds up to about $175 for both the supplement and Medicare Drug Plan. With this coverage, I can receive care from all Medicare providers in the U.S., and not worry about prior approvals or denials or delays in care and treatment. I’m confident that I am well covered for my senior years, with decisions about my health made by my doctor and me, not some employee at a Medicare Advantage company that makes more money if I don’t get the care I may need. 

Dr. Marvin Malek detailed the many drawbacks to MA plans earlier this year in an OPED titled “State workers — and the rest of us — should resist Medicare ‘Advantage.’” You can read it here: Tinyurl.com/NoMedicareAdvantage.

Linda Andrews, BSN, NP in Women’s Health Care, MPH

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Clean Heat Standard is just too expensive

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, In last week’s article by James Kent, “House Republicans mull a plan to repeal the environmental Clean Heat Standard,” he incorrectly suggests the cost impact on heating fuel is only a couple of cents per gallon, citing a report by Energy Futures. We wish that were true, but unfortunately it is not. Act…

Affordability and a healthy environment can coexist

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, As 2024 draws to a close, I resolve to start the new year with optimism and determination to protect what we care about. Our shared connection to the natural world lies at the heart of Vermont’s identity. We love the beauty and bounty of our state. We also know that a healthy environment…

Let’s welcome asylum seekers

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, Picture a young woman, nine months pregnant, compelled by forces beyond her control to leave home and make an arduous journey with her betrothed to a foreign land, unsure of their welcome there. At this time of year, most of us raised in the Christian tradition would pretty immediately, if unconsciously, imagine this…

Balancing public interests in wildlife policy

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, Let’s look at the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Board and Department and tell me if it needs modernizing. And for those unaware, the Board is a 14-member volunteer group comprising hunters, trappers, hound hunters, and anglers from every county. The Board makes public policy decisions on our shared public wildlife without fair representation…