On September 27, 2023

Trappers and hunters do the most for conservation


Dear Editor,

The Fish & Wildlife Board is made up of people with some level of knowledge and concern for hunting, fishing, trapping and conservation. Much like the first conservationists in this country 100 years ago, hunters, trappers, and fishers are the ones who do the most for conservation and always have. And not like many anti-groups will tell you so they have more animals to go after, but because they care and see what’s really happening out there.

 The best management practices was never developed to serve European fur markets (most fur today is used for crafts or sold to China) but to develop the most humane types and use of various traps. The foot hold continues to be the most humane and useful trap still today. It took decades for these methods to develop and are constantly being updated today. I have released bobcats and other animals with no injury from foot hold traps. When properly used, they pose no threat of damage and a non-target animal can be released. Other methods are either deadly to a non-target animal or of limited or no use for some species.

The rabid anti-everything real conservation types with groups like POW have no real facts or science on their side. Most, like the founder of POW, were not even up here when we lost most of the muskrat population to disease caused by overpopulation back in the 1990s because of the fur market and people stopped trapping them. When you can’t even cover the cost of your gas, it’s no longer profitable to trap. That is when trapping wildlife for profit really died in this country. Thank God for recreational trapping or we would be having more rabies, more flooded roads and fields and more species dying of disease from over populating.

I was fortunate to go on a caribou hunt back in 2004 in northern Quebec. At the time they could not get enough people to hunt them. 

Due to overpopulation and disease a herd of over 400,000 went to less than 100,000 today!

Please read that again for emphasis!

That is what happens when you do not have proper conservation.

Greg Paulman, Monkton

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Setting the record straight on education funding in Vermont

July 17, 2024
By Representative Pattie McCoy Editor’s note: McCoy, from Poultney, is the House Minority Leader. She has been a Republican house rep since 2015 serving Rutland-1. What’s the worst thing to do when you are stuck in a hole? Continuing to dig. And what is the worst thing to do in an affordability crisis? Make things…

What’s really going on with education funding

July 17, 2024
Dear Editor, Editor’s note: This letter is in response to Don Tinney’s commentary in the July 3 edition. Tinney is the president of Vermont-National Education Association (NEA), the union of 13,000 Vermont educators.  Tinney’s “hit piece” on Governor Scott is nothing new for the Vermont-NEA, although I’m surprised by the shrillness of the tone. Perhaps he realizes how…

New wildlife law protects against wanton waste

July 17, 2024
Dear Editor, Many cruel and unethical practices occur in Vermont’s fields and forests during hunting and trapping seasons, but you’ll never hear about them from Vermont Fish & Wildlife. Thankfully, watchdog groups like Protect Our Wildlife shed light on the most egregious, cruel and wanton acts of violence against wild animals in Vermont. One such act…

Learning to cope with floods

July 17, 2024
By Angelo Lynn Editor’s note: Angelo Lynn is the owner and publisher of the Addison Independent in Middlebury, a sister publication to the Mountain Times.  Lightning flashed outside my office window as weather forecasters were predicting two or more inches of rain, which got me reflecting on the $80 million to $90 million of federal…