On August 9, 2023

Support Plymouth’s short term rental ordinance


Dear Editor,

Discussion has ensued on two provisions following the Plymouth Select Board’s decision in May 2023 to amend elements of the Short-Term Rental (STR) Ordnance currently in place.  These changes were intended to make the regulations more reasonable and to encourage better compliance.  

Please vote yes to support the amended Short-Term Rental Ordinance.

Though not a voting resident of town, I am a fifth generation Plymouth property owner and taxpayer who offers our family property as a vacation rental. I have actively participated in the Select Board’s discussions and support their decision to make improvements to the STR Ordinance and I urge others to examine and support the changes adopted in May.  

Rationale for proposed amendments

Fire inspections, health condition controls, state lodging tax remittal, respect for neighbors — these are all things that should be embraced and followed by all rental businesses. 

The amendment to make Knox Boxes “recommended”’ instead of “required” is fair and reasonable and should be adopted. The rationale being put forth for Knox boxes being required is based on concern for renter safety/ease of first responder entrance. If this is the case, then it should be a requirement for all residences in town, so that all residents’ safety is safeguarded equally.  Furthermore, a management plan for the protection of residents’ privacy and security should be in place prior to any mandated entry provision.

The choices surrounding homeowners insurance is a personal matter and the details should not be dictated by the town.  I choose to maintain a full commercial rental policy because that’s what I want for myself and my guests. It seems an overreach for the town to oversee the details of my insurance policy.  If others choose to be underinsured, they put their property and family assets at risk, but this does not impact the community.

Other elements of the current regulations should be reconsidered in the near future as well, to help make the ordinance more feasible and reasonable for both sides.


Parking restrictions based on bedroom count are outdated and ineffective methods for addressing the relevant community concerns. Preventing people from parking in the street can easily be enforced with a town wide regulation that prohibits on-street parking.  Requiring on-site parking would be a reasonable item.


The current occupancy provision limits the number of people staying in a house due to the concern for septic capacity. However, this does not take into account other mitigation factors, such as more frequent septic pumping and the part-time occupancy of vacation-seekers. The Standards for Responsible Hosting set out by the  Vermont Short Term Rental Alliance (VTSTRA) recommend to “Limit occupancy to the legal limit determined by a State Fire Safety Certification, or limit occupancy to two people times the number of legal bedrooms plus two (to prevent sewer/septic damage, control wastewater management, and prevent neighborhood disturbances)”. 

Safety inspection

Requiring every vacation rental to complete a full, in-person inspection in every year is excessive and impractical for Vermont’s limited fire safety resources.  VTSTRA recommends that vacation rentals “complete a fire & life safety inspection every 5 years”, which is adequate and aligns with standards set for long-term rental units in other Vermont towns.  

I hope that the voters of Plymouth will consider all the information and facts that have been circulated and debated when they vote on the Select Board’s amendments on Aug. 15.  

Vacation rentals provide positive economic contribution to the community and the Select Board members have worked hard to improve the rules. They deserve the community’s support.  

James Tepper,  Plymouth

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Short-term rentals are a scapegoat for every housing issue

June 12, 2024
Dear Editor, Short-term rental owners are not the evil housing tycoons we are sometimes made out to be. Vacation rentals peppered around our state make up just 2.5% of our housing stock yet contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to our state budget in the form of rooms/meals taxes and consumer spending. I’ve lived in Guilford for…

Override Scott’s veto to protect pollinator, ecosystem, public health

June 12, 2024
Dear Editor, In the peaceful farmlands and meadows of Vermont, a silent emergency unfolds. Bees, the heart of our agricultural ecosystem, face unprecedented threats to their survival. Despite Vermont Agency of Agriculture Food and Market reports claiming that bee populations are thriving, beekeepers around the state emphasize the deteriorating health of their colonies. These adverse…

Vermonters deserve affordability, but Gov. Scott has no ‘grand plan’ 

June 12, 2024
By Rep. Rebecca Holcombe Editor’s note: Holcombe is the state house representative for Windsor-Orange 2 and member of the Vermont House Appropriations Committee. She also served as the Vermont Secretary of Education 2014-2018. It’s groundhog day. Governor Scott vetoed the yield bill, again leaving Vermont school districts adrift. The reason: all the school budgets voters…

‘Time we stopped, hey,what’s that sound? Everybody look what’s going down’

June 5, 2024
Dear Editor, The movement to stop Israel’s murderous campaign against Palestinian civilians is up against the entire American military/industrial/congressional complex and assorted American war/death culture allies like AIPAC, The Heritage Foundation, and Fox News. Leaders of the most powerful American institutions and major party presidential candidates Donald Trump and Joe Biden want to continue official…