On November 23, 2022

There is a better way to post private property

Dear Editor,

Vermont should adopt the Purple Paint Law (PPL) to replace the annual posting of private property.

The PPL allows landowners to “post” their property with stripes of purple paint applied according to specific instructions on trees or fence posts. Most states stipulate the stripes must be vertical and not less than eight inches long and not less than one inch wide. They are to be placed no lower than three feet and no higher than five feet above the ground and must be readily visible to anyone approaching the property — no more than 100 feet apart in forested land and 1,000 feet apart in open land.

This system would allow a welcome alternative to the current yellow posted signs but would not replace the current system. Under the PPL, landowners could choose which method they want to use to protect their property. If a property were sold and the new owner wanted to allow access, the stripes could be painted over.
Posting with “signs” that are permanent and do not have to be updated every year would be beneficial for many landowners who wish to prohibit hunting on their property. The present posting regulations are arduous and challenging for many people for a variety of reasons. Signs made of metal or plastic are expensive, especially for large properties or farms. The less expensive Tyvek signs degrade over time and must be replaced. They are also easily damaged or removed, which may make property no longer legally posted.

Under the current system, every single sign must be dated annually and must include the name and address of the property owner. Landowners must file annually with their town clerk and pay a small fee. If these conditions are not met every year, your land is not posted legally, and you have no control of what activities may take place there. People can legally hunt without permission, in some cases at night, for most months of the year on unposted, or improperly posted, land.

I am 69 years old and have 30 acres surrounded by properties open to hunting and trapping. I have a herd of rescued equines including five minis about the same size and coloring as bears or deer. I enjoy walking my property every day year-round with my dogs, who also resemble bears or deer in size and coloring, and especially enjoy the autumn months (i.e.: hunting season) when the foliage is so beautiful.

To ensure the safety of my animals and myself I do not want hunting or trapping on my property. So, every year I must walk the perimeter of my 30 acres and update my posted signs. Due to the regulations about placement, some signs must be in areas that can be challenging to access due to the terrain. I’m fine now, although this task is time-consuming, but I worry about the future and what will happen if I am unable to physically maintain the posted boundary of the land I own and on which I pay hefty property taxes.

An additional concern is that Vermont leads the nation in incidents of Lyme and other tick-borne diseases. Forcing people to traipse through fields of high grass and shrubs, the perfect habitat for ticks, to post their property, is unfair and unsafe. Painting a stripe is clearly more economical, efficient, equitable, and physically easier, than the current posting system. People who are physically challenged due to age or disability would benefit from this law.

As an alternative option to the present posting regulations, the Purple Paint Law would offer a fair and effective means of posting and protecting private property.

If you agree with me and would like Vermont to join the 17 states that have already adopted this law, please contact your state legislators, and let them know you support the implementation of the Purple Paint law in Vermont.

Jennifer Lovett,
Starksboro

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…