On July 6, 2022

Roe opponents are misguided

Dear Editor, While I was listening to the news about Roe v. Wade and the Supreme Court, a young man was interviewed. He was excited about all of the thousands of lives that will be saved. I would like to ask him (and others who agree with him) if they will help support:

  • The family who loses mother and wife through pregnancy complications?
  • The family of the teen or preteen girl who has a baby and lacks the maturity to care for it?
  • The family who has a child with profound disabilities and requires full-time care and thousands or millions of dollars for care?
  • The family who can barely, if at all, care for the existing family and now has another?
  • The single mother who will need to choose between caring for her infant or maintaining a full-time job?

And I hear the argument that the woman should never have gotten pregnant. For some, they did not understand the consequences. For some, it was unintended consequences. Some wanted a baby but are faced with severe consequences. Some lacked the ability to put the consequences before the biological urge.

But, I repeat. Many of these families are going to need help. They make the choice based on the information they have. Who are we to judge the correctness of these choices? They should each have the right to make choices based on the information they may have. You are not walking in their moccasins.

Holly Puterbaugh,
Middlebury

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…