On April 13, 2022

More public discussion needed on Prop. 5

Dear Editor, 

Amending the Vermont Constitution is a long and arduous process, taking four affirmative votes in the legislature (two in each chamber) over two biennia, followed by a statewide popular vote, which, for Proposal 5, will take place this November. The purpose of all this is to ensure that the public has time to engage and understand what the proposed amendment is all about. 

However, Proposal 5’s journey has taken place almost entirely under Covid-19 lockdowns and restrictions on public gatherings. It has not received the kind of public scrutiny it needs and deserves. Most Vermonters don’t know what they will be voting on this fall, nor are most aware that they will be casting a vote to change our constitution at all. 

Proposal 5 reads in its entirety:  “That an individual’s right to personal reproductive autonomy is central to the liberty and dignity to determine one’s own life course and shall not be denied or infringed unless justified by a compelling State interest achieved by the least restrictive means.”

Some key points that Vermonters need to understand regarding Proposal 5 are:

  • Although this amendment is being sold as protection for women’s/abortion rights, it does not mention “women,”“abortion” or “pregnancy.” This is a highly problematic legal “bait and switch.”
  • By conferring an equal right to “personal reproductive autonomy” on men as well as women, Proposal 5 could actually undermine a woman’s right to choose to end or carry a pregnancy to term if that decision is in conflict with the biological father’s equally protected right to reproduce. A spokesperson for the ACLU testified that such conflicts would need to be resolved in court. This is a step back for abortion rights.
  • The vagueness in the language opens the door to multiple unintended consequences, such as state-sanctioned eugenics in the form of genetically modified “designer babies, rendering unconstitutional age of consent laws (e.g., possibly legalizing pedophilia), and undermining parental rights and responsibilities in regard to their children’s sexual health.
  • Local public panel discussions critical to have before Vermonters vote in November, or 45 days earlier if they cast an early ballot. 

Vermonters for Good Government would be happy to partner with local media outlets to further these types of discussions.  If you are interested in working with us, please contact: Matthew Strong, the executive director at Matthew@Vermonters
forgoodgovernment.org.

Matthew Strong, executive director, Vermonters For Good Government

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Quarter Pounder packs a wallop

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, There is a problem with our food systems. The recent E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounder hamburgers has led to illness, hospitalization, and even death. The CDC, FDA, and other health agencies are investigating, with fresh slivered onions and quarter-pound beef patties as the suspected sources of contamination. This incident isn’t…

Doctors need more time with patients, not less

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, Bruce Hamory’s recommendation to the Green Mountain Care Board to reduce doctors’ time with patients is completely off base. The report’s conclusion that the state will have enough primary care providers is based on primary care providers (PCPs) seeing three patients per hour, and many internists, who see more complex patients, currently see a…

Doing away with the Electoral College would make Vt’s votes matter less

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, (In response to Matthew Cecere’s commentary, “The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could give Vermont voters more impact”). I’m amazed to see an educator come out in favor of such a ridiculous concept, and to also be in favor of abolishing the Electoral College. No, the Electoral College is not perfect. But, it is…

Burdened by homelessness

November 6, 2024
‘Not in my backyard’ is hitting Rutland hard, solutions must be statewide By Alis Headlam Editor’s note: Alis Headlam, of Rutland, is a former educator and member of Project VISION. The “not in my backyard” syndrome has put the Rutland area in a very difficult situation. Rutland has become the go-to place for people who…