On March 23, 2022

Fluoride isn’t needed

Dear Editor,

Please excuse the proud parent quoting a letter of our son Gregory Crowther to state Senators in the Seattle area. He writes about a bill designed to expand and make permanent fluoridation in Washington State.

His remarks are worth sharing in fluoridated Rutland, because they focus on fluoride and body function, often overlooked in discussions about teeth.

Crowther graduated from Rutland High School in 1991. His solid preparation in Rutland schools helped him eventually to earn a doctorate in physiology and biophysics at the University of Washington in 2002. He is now a tenured professor at Everett Community College, just north of Seattle, teaching anatomy and physiology.

Here’s the gist of what Crowther wrote to state senators:

“I have read the bill [H 1684] and am alarmed by its overly pro-fluoride stance. Like you, I have not read enough of the original studies to gain a full picture of potential risks. Speaking as a biologist, though, here is the bottom line. Fluoride is not a nutrient needed by the body at any level; there are zero molecules synthesized by the human body that require a fluorine atom. Thus, the anti-fluoridation activists are completely correct to classify fluoride as a medical drug.

I applaud HB 1684’s focus on marginalized communities, but I scoff at the idea that these communities are well-served by a bill that makes it easier to put a drug (maybe innocuous, maybe not) into their water supplies without their informed consent — informed consent being a bedrock principle of ethical biomedical research and practice.

Informed consent does not simply ask each subject/patient to read information and ask questions… instead, it requires that they truly understand a proposed intervention before the intervention is enacted. This is simply not feasible with mass administration of a drug via a public water supply.

Thus, despite my generally high trust in government scientists and medical officers …I ask you, in this particular case, to reject this patriarchal, just-trust-the-government approach to supporting underserved residents.”

Signed by Gregory Crowther, PhD.

Obviously Crowthier’s objections to fluoridation apply equally to Rutland, whose water has been fluoridated since 1984.

Jack Crowther, Rutland

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Quarter Pounder packs a wallop

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, There is a problem with our food systems. The recent E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounder hamburgers has led to illness, hospitalization, and even death. The CDC, FDA, and other health agencies are investigating, with fresh slivered onions and quarter-pound beef patties as the suspected sources of contamination. This incident isn’t…

Doctors need more time with patients, not less

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, Bruce Hamory’s recommendation to the Green Mountain Care Board to reduce doctors’ time with patients is completely off base. The report’s conclusion that the state will have enough primary care providers is based on primary care providers (PCPs) seeing three patients per hour, and many internists, who see more complex patients, currently see a…

Doing away with the Electoral College would make Vt’s votes matter less

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, (In response to Matthew Cecere’s commentary, “The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could give Vermont voters more impact”). I’m amazed to see an educator come out in favor of such a ridiculous concept, and to also be in favor of abolishing the Electoral College. No, the Electoral College is not perfect. But, it is…

Burdened by homelessness

November 6, 2024
‘Not in my backyard’ is hitting Rutland hard, solutions must be statewide By Alis Headlam Editor’s note: Alis Headlam, of Rutland, is a former educator and member of Project VISION. The “not in my backyard” syndrome has put the Rutland area in a very difficult situation. Rutland has become the go-to place for people who…