On November 10, 2021

Gov. Scott, give towns the tools to protect their residents

Dear Editor,

The recent news that Vermont experienced 487 Covid cases on Thursday, Nov. 4, breaking the all-time record by more than 100 cases, was extremely disheartening even to the most optimistic Vermonters.

Friday followed on its heels with 377 new cases and a 3.3% positivity rate. With more than 90% of eligible Vermonters vaccinated, one has to wonder what is going on.

The governor issued his emergency executive order on March 13, 2020, and it served Vermonters extremely well through the first year of the pandemic. Back in the spring of this year and most of last year, Vermont was the envy of the nation. Through most of the spring and summer, the moving average of new cases in Vermont was in the single digits.

In response, when Vermont hit the 80% vaccination rate among eligible Vermonters on June 15, Gov. Scott rescinded all state Covid-19 restrictions and ended the declared state of emergency.

Clearly, we are not out of the woods. Even with a 90% vaccination rate, our cases are rocketing up. And the number of breakthrough cases is concerning.

Vermont is a significant and unwelcome outlier in the national downward trend of cases right now. Gov. Scott continues to encourage mask wearing, getting vaccinated and socially distancing.

Is encouragement enough? We know that masks work. Several communities moved to impose a mask mandate this fall when cases started going up again. However, Gov. Scott’s administration has determined that the selectboard or city council and local health officer need to ask permission to impose a mask mandate now that the emergency order is no longer in effect.

They could grant that authority and allow select boards and city councils to increase protection of their residents. The simple fact is, to date they have refused.

The administration could, in these uncertain times, grant local officials the authority to impose mask mandates at the local level when Covid transmission and caseloads in their communities warrant additional measures to assure public safety. Likewise, the Legislature could extend that authority to local governing bodies.

It is high time to provide the tools for towns to protect their residents.

Karen Horn,
Barre Director, public policy and advocacy, Vermont League of Cities and Towns

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Gov. Phil Scott, we’ve never needed you more, where are you?

July 2, 2025
Dear Editor, I was scheduled to be the final speaker at the “No Kings” rally in Burlington last week. Unfortunately, the event ran longer than anticipated, and I was not able to address the crowd. Here’s what I had planned to say:  Good afternoon. My name is Larry Satcowitz. I’m a state representative from Randolph.…

H.454 passed but not a done deal

July 2, 2025
By Rep. Peter Conlon Editor’s note: Rep. Peter Conlon, D-Cornwall, is chair of the House Education Committee. The passage of the education bill, H. 454, in the General Assembly, and presumably gaining the governor’s signature into law, marks the start of efforts to transform Vermont’s education system into one that recognizes the incredible demographic changes…

The worst bill in modern U.S. history

July 2, 2025
By U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders Editor’s note: Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) gave the following remarks Sunday, June 29, on the floor of the U.S. Senate opposing President Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill.” Mr. President: President Trump’s so-called “Big, Beautiful Bill,” now on the floor of the Senate, is the most dangerous piece of legislation in the modern history…

Protecting SNAP protects farmers

July 2, 2025
Dear Editor, As the director of the Burlington Farmers Market I am deeply concerned about what’s happening in Congress right now and the potential to gut Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid, two of the most essential programs that help people put food on the table and get the healthcare they need. At our…