On August 11, 2021

Correcting two decades of harm in school finance

Dear Editor,

Education finance in Vermont is an often hard-to-understand and quite complex system.

Act 59 of 2021 created the Task Force on the Implementation of the Pupil Weighting Factors Report, a group of eight Vermont legislators who will spend time this summer, as the name implies, determining the best path forward to implement the report’s recommendations.

This isn’t an overhaul; this is correcting two decades of harm caused by a flawed formula.

Sec 1(c) of Act 59 of 2021 states, “The major recommendations of the [2019 Pupil Weighting Factors] Report are straightforward, specifically that the General Assembly increase certain of the existing weights and that it add population density (rurality) as a new weighting factor, given the report’s finding that rural districts pay more to educate a student.”

The study from which the report was written was conducted by a team of nationally renowned researchers from UVM, Rutgers and American Institute for Research. They unequivocally concluded the current weights, a leftover relic of the pre-Act 60 days, do not account for the cost differences in educating different students … and the existing weights “have weak ties, if any, with evidence.”

The Vermont Constitution requires we provide “equal educational opportunities” for all Vermont children. According to the June 28, 2021, document from the Joint Fiscal Office, FY20 Weighting Study Education Spending and School Size Analysis, 65% of Vermont school districts are underweighted. That means 65% of school districts have lower taxing capacity than is necessary to adequately educate their students.

Taxing capacity is one of those concepts that’s difficult to wrap your mind around. For ease of understanding, think of it this way: 65% of districts have been receiving fewer funds from the state than it costs to provide equal educational opportunities for all Vermont children. Over the past 20-plus years, some of those districts have increased their tax rates in order to provide for their students. Other districts haven’t been able to adequately provide for their students.

The 2019 Pupil Weighting Factors Report found that the pupil weighting formula is inequitable. The task force will produce a report and write legislation that will be brought to the Legislature for action in January 2022, for the purpose of correcting the pupil weighting formula. Doing so will not bring additional funds into the system. Doing so will bring the equity to the pupil weighting formula that hasn’t been achieved by Acts 60 and 68.  Equity ultimately benefits everyone.

Marc B. Schauber, Dover

Schauber is of the executive director Coalition for Vermont Student Equity.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…