On August 5, 2021

Investing in HCBS

Dear Editor,

Most people don’t know what Home & Community Based Services (HCBS) are, let alone their importance to many disabled people. People who are physically disabled often depend on others to perform “activities of daily living” like getting in and out of bed, dressing, bathing, preparing meals, toileting and transferring to and from a wheelchair.

If you are physically and financially eligible, a state’s HCBS program, usually funded by Medicaid, will pay for assistants to come to your home.

But states don’t always supply the needed resources and applicants languish, sometimes for years, waiting to get the services they need.

Vermont’s Medicaid-funded HCBS program is called Choices for Care.

One definition of infrastructure is the basic systems and services, needed to function effectively. For many people who are physically disabled, that is exactly what HCBS services do. So I was delighted to learn that President Biden’s $2 trillion American Jobs Plan proposed investing $400 billion in the “infrastructure of care,” defined as “the policies, resources, and services necessary to help U.S. families meet their caregiving needs… [including] home- and community-based services and supports.”

This commitment to home and community-based services throughout the country would “solidify the infrastructure of our care economy by creating jobs and raising wages and benefits for essential home care workers.”

Some people oppose treating in-home care as “infrastructure.”

Mike Ervin, an outspoken disability rights activist, says, “That’s because the ability of disabled folks to live rich lives in supportive communities is of no importance to them. So HCBS does not register in their small imaginations as important infrastructure.”

Funds from the American Jobs Plan could make needed improvements to Vermont’s Choices for Care program.

Currently Vermont caregivers are paid a wage just above the minimum wage, which reduces the pool of people willing to do this vital work and, consequently, the quality of the care given.

The program also requires that applicants be impoverished; they must shed assets that could be used to maintain a home, a car, an accessible van, or the purchase of food for a specialized diet. Income from work can result in loss of Medicaid eligibility, hence eligibility for the Care program.

I hope the American Jobs Plan funds could also be used here in Vermont to bolster and revitalize the Participant Directed Attendant Care program. It’s not Medicaid based, does not require that assets be shed, and does not discourage employment.

Charlie Murphy
Bennington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Vermont values under ‘atax:’ Vermonters rally to challenge threat to food, water, shelter

June 19, 2024
Dear Editor, A broad cross section of Vermonters gathered in the State House cafeteria to express their displeasure with the direction the state’s political leadership is taking them. (And that was April 25; things have not improved since.) Feeling ignored or otherwise discounted and marginalized, and in some cases, even mocked, the diverse group chose…

Universal School Meals: Delivering for Vermont children, families and schools

June 19, 2024
By Teddy Waszazak Editor’s note: Teddy Waszazak is a resident of Barre and the Legislative Policy Lead at Hunger Free Vermont, a statewide advocacy and education nonprofit working to end hunger in Vermont. As another school year comes to a close, all of us in Vermont have two exciting milestones to celebrate: the start of…

VTSU should renew its commitment to diversity office

June 19, 2024
Dear Editor, In the summer of 2020, the nation watched 8 minutes and 46 seconds of video of a Minneapolis police officer kneeling on the neck of a detained man named George Floyd until Floyd was asphyxiated to death. It was horrific, and Floyd was only one of several people of color who died at…

Scott was right to veto H.887

June 19, 2024
Dear Editor, Our state Legislature is meeting this week to vote on overriding Governor Scott’s vetoes of legislation introduced during the latest session. One of the bills for consideration is H. 887, the annual “yield bill,” which funds our public education system through property taxes. Governor Scott has rightly vetoed this bill because, according to…