On June 9, 2021

PFAS, public health and regulation of use

Dear Editor,

During my 35-year career as a naturopathic physician I noticed that the natural treatments that had been successful in keeping people healthy in the 1980s became less and less effective. During these years the toxic load of chemicals in the environment has increased drastically. One group of fluoride containing chemicals known as PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) does not break down in the environment, bioaccumulates in the body, and causes multiple health problems interfering with liver and thyroid function, hormone balance, the immune system and child development. It has also been linked to testicular and kidney cancer. 

For this reason I am grateful that when Governor Scott signed S.20 into law recently, Vermont became the ninth state to enact regulations on some types of PFAS. 

Through the efforts of the Vermont Military Poisons Coalition members and the testimony of WILPF member Marguerite Adelman, amid intense industry opposition, the bill was successfully amended in the House to include a deadline of Oct. 1, 2023, for a ban on the manufacture, sale, and distribution of class B firefighting foams, which contains PFAS. 

Unfortunately legislative leaders said they couldn’t require the use of the fluorine-free foams by the military, citing federal preemption as their basis even though there are safe and effective alternatives already in use in other nations by other militaries. S. 20 does not challenge the authority of the federal government to require the use of poison foams in our communities, so the Vermont National Guard is exempt from oversight. 

My question is: Why is the military allowed to keep contaminating the environment and harming its members and nearby communities unnecessarily?

The Vermont Military Poisons Coalition will continue to educate and advocate for the elimination of these dangerous chemicals, already known to be leaching into our drinking water supplies from seven Guard installations in the state.

We need to do so much more to end PFAS contamination of the environment and our bodies, including clean-up, regulating PFAS as a class of man-made chemicals, etc.

Catherine Bock, Charlotte

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The magical mythical equalized pupil

May 15, 2024
By Tom Evslin Editor’s note: Tom Evslin, of Stowe, is a retired high-tech entrepreneur. He served as transportation secretary for Gov. Richard Snelling and stimulus czar for Gov. Jim Douglas. The Vermont Legislature is playing an expensive shell game — and planning worse. The “equalized pupil” is the shell under which the pea is hidden.…

Tell the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to protect the Connecticut River

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, It has been 12 years since the relicensing process began for five hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut River, and until May 22, there is an opportunity to comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  The last time these hydro facilities were licensed was in 1979, and once the new licenses are issued,…

UVM, don’t punish student protesters

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, As a pastor, I feel it is my professional and moral responsibility to speak to the crisis of conscience facing our nation and state. As of this writing, the civilian death toll in Gaza stands at around 34,654 according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. A third of these casualties are children. I do…

H.289: Good intentions on renewables but one big flaw

May 8, 2024
By David Bittersdorf Editor’s note: Dave Blittersdorf is the president of All Earth Renewables in Bristol. The Vermont General Assembly — in attempt to move the state to 100% renewable energy — is making changes to how the state’s utilities buy energy. Within the next couple of weeks, the Senate Natural Resources Committee will consider…