On May 26, 2021

Religious schools and public money

Dear Editor,

I wish to agree with Rebecca Holcombe’s views about religious schools taking public money on the basis of “nondiscrimination” for a religious school, while those schools not only discriminate, as the Grace School in the article does in a heinous manner, denying gay people’s humanity as they do, but have traditionally been allowed to do much more “their way.”

I refer to staff members who would never meet public school qualifications, and some of whom have been caught in some serious improprieties (usually sexual) that would get a public school teacher fired. It’s always galling to me to see a big black headline about a “teacher” caught in a sexual relationship with a student or some such thing, only to read that the “teacher” was working in a private (mostly religious) school where qualifications for the job are often quite lax.

Public school teachers routinely jump through multiple hoops to stay qualified. Many have master’s degrees at least, and are well qualified in whatever field they specialize. Not so with religious schools. 

Then there is the question of other discrimination. Students with drug problems? Boot them out. Students who criticize anything remotely connected to the school’s religious policies and proclamations? Boot them out, too. Sexual impropriety among students? There’s the door, especially for any female caught getting pregnant. Those with severe special education needs? Don’t let them in in the first place. Let public schools deal with the problems.

Certainly not all religious schools are guilty of all these criticisms, but that they hide behind the First Amendment when it suits them to pick and choose which public school requirements to abide by — if any — is pure hypocrisy when they then expect the public to pay their bills.

There! I’ve said what has bothered me about this issue for decades, including the last year of my teaching in public school when a student had been kicked out of a local Catholic high school for drug-related problems and ended up in my classroom, where he routinely flouted my basic classroom rules. I was told I had to deal with him. Period. Thanks for the forum.

Diane Alberts, Rutland

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

We won’t forget Vermonters

January 8, 2025
Dear Editor,  More than any post-election period that I can recall, Vermonters remain heavily engaged since November’s election. So engaged that many want to know why the problems highlighted on Nov. 5 haven’t already been fixed: education property taxes, housing affordability and availability, healthcare costs, public safety, and the Clean Heat Standard.  This urgency, like…

Vermont Saves makes saving for retirement an easy resolution

January 8, 2025
Dear Editor, As we welcome the New Year, many Vermonters set resolutions to build new skills, improve their health, or spend more time with loved ones. This year, let’s add a resolution that really pays off: saving for retirement. Saving for retirement can be daunting, especially for Vermonters living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to…

Common ground: Working together to address Vermont’s affordability crisis

January 8, 2025
By Amy Spear and Megan Sullivan Editor’s note: Amy Spear, Killington, is the president of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce. Megan Sullivan, Chittenden, is the vice president of government affairs for the Vermont Chamber of Commerce. Each year, the Vermont Chamber of Commerce outlines its legislative priorities with one focus in mind: creating the conditions…

End funding of religious schools

January 2, 2025
Dear Editor, Thanks to G. Gregory Hughes for his Dec. 18 letter, “The dictates of conscience in Vermont.” Mr. Hughes identifies a fundamental flaw in our laws: they allow spending tax money on religious schools. He also suggests a sensible solution to the problem: eliminating state expenditures on all private or religious schools. To paraphrase…