On April 14, 2021

Bottle bill’s negative effects will be felt by all 

Dear Editor,

I’ve been watching the work of the Legislature closely this year as a business owner concerned with the economic toll the pandemic has taken on our state. The majority of the Legislature’s work this year has revolved around the pandemic and offering economic relief to Vermonters. There is real and justified concern in the Legislature over how deep the economic impacts have been and will continue to be on individuals and businesses and I applaud them on their work to help our state recover. But unfortunately, that’s not the entire story of the 2021 legislative session. There is also a proposal rapidly making its way through the Legislature that would make Vermont more expensive and negatively impact our economy.

H.175 is an expanded version of the so-called “bottle bill.” The original bottle bill, passed in 1972, was designed to keep litter off our roads and out of our scenic pastures. The bottle bill incentivized people to bring recycling back to retailers by charging them and then refunding them a 5-cent deposit. And it worked. But that was 1972. Vermont didn’t have a recycling system set up as we do today.

Today, our recycling system is easy and accessible for all. Today, most Vermonters put their bottles into our recycling system. In fact, we have one of the highest recycling rates in the nation. Expanding an antiquated, out of date bottle bill that will only make it more expensive for consumers to buy products and recycle is not only tone deaf but appears to be a solution in search of a problem.

At a time when Vermonters are already struggling to make ends meet, this new and expanded bottle bill would impose a 5 cent deposit on lots of beverages that consumers pay no deposit on now like water, sports drinks and fruit juice. The cost of a case of water for example could increase by $1.20 for the deposit alone. Let me ask you: Does this seem like the right time to be increasing the cost to Vermonters at the grocery store?

And not only will consumers pay more but they could have fewer choices of products to choose from. Manufacturers based out of state and overseas may very well choose not to label products specifically for Vermont’s small market and choose to simply not supply their products to the Vermont market. I sell a number of products in my store. Will Gatorade really create a special label just for the Vermont market? In all likelihood, no. The cost wouldn’t be worth it to them and they could instead choose to not sell their products in Vermont. The end result? Higher costs and less choice for consumers.

What’s more, consumers will also pay more when they go to recycle. By taking the most valuable materials, such as aluminum and plastic, out of the single source/curbside recycling system and placing them into an expensive system like the bottle bill threatens our recycling system and increases the cost of recycling for every consumer.

So, let me ask again: Does this seem like the right time to be increasing the cost to Vermonters at both the cash register and for the cost of recycling? With no benefit to the environment and only harm to our recycling system, I believe the answer is no.

Consumers aren’t the only ones that would be negatively impacted by this legislation. Small businesses along our state’s borders, such as my own, would feel an immediate impact from this measure, as consumers understandably looking to avoid a hefty cost increase on their beverages would cross the border or order online to purchase cheaper beverages.

Vermonters, including consumers and business owners, have suffered enough economic pain from the pandemic. One only has to look at the record numbers of Vermonters seeking help from food shelves to know that this is not the time to raise the cost of Vermonters’ grocery bills. I know I see the pain and anguish in some of my customers’ eyes every single day as they scrape together the money to pay for their gas and groceries.

If you are concerned about the impact of this legislation on your budget, your local store owner or your recycling center please contact your legislator to share your concerns.

Sincerely,

Marty Beattie

Marty’s First Stop in Danville

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness

July 24, 2024
By Frank Knaack and Falko Schilling Editor’s note: This commentary is by Frank Knaack, executive director of the Housing and Homelessness Alliance of Vermont, and Falko Schilling, advocacy director of the ACLU of Vermont. Homelessness in Vermont is at its highest level on record, as more people struggle to afford sky high-rents and housing costs. According…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

The arc of agingand leadership

July 24, 2024
By Bill Schubart Like a good novel, our lives have a narrative arc, during which we are actively participating in and relevant to our world. We are born, rise slowly into sensual consciousness and gradually process what we see and feel. Our juvenile perceptions gradually become knowledge, and, if all goes well, that knowledge binds…