On March 24, 2021

S.10, UI Legislation, will cost Vermont job creators more than $47-$56 million

Dear Editor,

Editor’s note: the following is an open letter to members of the Vermont Senate. 

On behalf of NFIB and AGC/VT members in Vermont, we are writing to express our opposition to S.10, legislation that was intended to hold harmless small businesses from the historic event – pandemic unemployment in the magnitude of $1 billon.

NFIB went on record in the Senate economic development committee on February 2, 2021 supporting legislation as introduced because it provided relief of charges from March 15 to December 31, 2020. Going into this historic pandemic the Vermont Unemployment Trust Fund was overfinanced, so providing small businesses protection from a cost shock certainly would have been appreciated.

However, S.10 as passed out of the Senate economic development committee (the committee) will cost Vermont small business owners $47-$56 million. The bill:

Increases benefits by 20% which will add $35 million in costs to small business owners – this only makes it harder to encourage workers to come back into the workforce.

creates a new benefit for dependent coverage that will cost an est. $12-$21 million in costs – a significant change passed in the 11th hour without any testimony.

Here are some key facts for your consideration:

The unemployment insurance tax is paid by employers (not employees). Employers pay into Vermont’s UI fund based on four variables: Experience rating, tax rate schedules (currently set at schedule-1), taxable wage base and benefit ratio.

Employers are not responsible for the increased use in 2020; rather it came as a direct result of government orders to close or restrict business activity.

Providing relief in the bill as introduced from this historic period of use of the fund is not a gift (or a “business handout”) it is simply adjusting it at a slower rate (businesses will still have to pay for the $1 billion in benefits that was paid out in 2020).

Vermont was more fortunate than most states as our fund was overfinanced going into 2020, so although we have a financial hole to dig out of to ensure solvency of the UI fund, S.10 proposes to dig a deeper hole.

What adds to the shock of the committee’s action on S.10 is that, just days ago, the federal government announced a Covid relief package that will generously provide Vermont with more than $2.7 billion in federal aid because of its small state-status.

Prior to the pandemic, small businesses provided 157,322 jobs in Vermont, more than 60% of the state’s workforce, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration. Companies with fewer than 20 employees created the largest percentage of new jobs. They may be small, but side by side they are an economic powerhouse.

Your focus on fulfilling critical needs to help Vermont’s job creators emerge from this historic economic crisis is paramount — mitigate cost shocks and long-term cost impacts that will result from the passage of S.10 as passed by the committee will hurt already struggling Vermont businesses.

Passing legislation that will cost Vermont’s small businesses in excess of $50 million at a time when the federal government is about to release $2.7 billion in Covid recovery support makes no sense.

This bill does more harm than good; therefore, we ask you to oppose S.10.

Sincerely,

Shawn Shouldice,
Vermont state director
National Federation of Independent Business/VT

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Quarter Pounder packs a wallop

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, There is a problem with our food systems. The recent E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounder hamburgers has led to illness, hospitalization, and even death. The CDC, FDA, and other health agencies are investigating, with fresh slivered onions and quarter-pound beef patties as the suspected sources of contamination. This incident isn’t…

Doctors need more time with patients, not less

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, Bruce Hamory’s recommendation to the Green Mountain Care Board to reduce doctors’ time with patients is completely off base. The report’s conclusion that the state will have enough primary care providers is based on primary care providers (PCPs) seeing three patients per hour, and many internists, who see more complex patients, currently see a…

Doing away with the Electoral College would make Vt’s votes matter less

November 6, 2024
Dear Editor, (In response to Matthew Cecere’s commentary, “The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could give Vermont voters more impact”). I’m amazed to see an educator come out in favor of such a ridiculous concept, and to also be in favor of abolishing the Electoral College. No, the Electoral College is not perfect. But, it is…

Burdened by homelessness

November 6, 2024
‘Not in my backyard’ is hitting Rutland hard, solutions must be statewide By Alis Headlam Editor’s note: Alis Headlam, of Rutland, is a former educator and member of Project VISION. The “not in my backyard” syndrome has put the Rutland area in a very difficult situation. Rutland has become the go-to place for people who…