On February 3, 2021

Sweden offers lesson in higher ed funding

Dear Editor,

President Biden is absolutely correct in starting the process to reform the American higher education system. Simply forgiving loans and making higher education “free” is fraught with fundamental issues and will only lead to financial disaster unless tuition reform becomes part of a bigger plan hopefully based perhaps on the extremely successful Swedish model. Despite what American politicians claim, Swedes know better than knowing their education is free and time at university is serious business.

In Sweden, as is the case with healthcare, tuition is deferred just as it is in America for primary education. The major difference is that students who choose higher education continue to defer their tuition payments until they are tax-paying adults who in turn support younger students. A smaller difference is the forfeiture of autonomy and significant choice in curriculum. The goal of education is to efficiently produce a spectrum of students to be productive and support the society via taxes.

In Sweden the biggest test one will ever take is an aptitude test in middle school. This determines the line of education the student will follow for the rest of their education with very few exceptions. Curriculum is predetermined and standardized testing is the metric of success.

“Underwater basket weaving” and “Art of the Selfie” simply do not exist in any list of academic choices. Swedish graduates emerge from education in a very predictable and standardized fashion at the ready to enter society. They are accustomed to repaying their debt to society for their education in the form of taxes during their productive years of life.

Simply negating debt will put a massive burden on the students who may benefit now but will have to somehow figure how to pay back the enormous debt transfer they will have to pay back later. The federal student loan program is a massive source of revenue for the government that will have to be made up for elsewhere to meet the bottom line at some point.

Biden is on the right track but as we all hopefully learned as young children that if something sounds too good to be true it probably is. Debt forgiveness and “free” tuition make for great campaign promises but in any realistic reality are part of a bigger picture.

Anders Holm,
Portsmouth, N.H.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

If Vt wants a future of abundance, we must choose to build

April 23, 2025
By Miro Weinberger Editor’s note: Weinberger is currently the executive chair of Let’s Build Homes. He was raised in Hartland and served as mayor of Burlington from 2012-2024. If you’ve turned on a podcast, watched a late-night show, or scrolled social media in the past month, you’ve probably heard something about “Abundance,” the new book…

Vermont School Board Asso. supports H.454 ed plan

April 23, 2025
Dear Editor, VSBA supports the bill as a more thoughtful and phased approach than Governor Scott’s rushed, five district proposal. Grounded in a more realistic timeline: H.454 is the most grounded and actionable proposal developed during the 2025 session. It acknowledges the operational realities education leaders face every day. The implementation timeline is more manageable…

Vote Bill Vines for Killington Select Board

April 23, 2025
Dear Editor, At the special election on May 28, I am running for the 2-year seat on the Killington Select Board. An incredibly diverse group of people call Killington home; my partner Mary Furlong and I included. After years of renting a ski house, we purchased our first Killington home in 1995. In 1997 we…

The real enemy isn’t fear, it’s how we let it divide us

April 23, 2025
By Stanley McChrystal Editor’s Note: Stanley McChrystal, who is retired from the Army, is the former commander of U.S. and International Security Assistance Forces in Afghanistan and the former commander of Joint Special Operations Command. He is the author of the forthcoming book “On Character: Choices That Define a Life.” This commentary was first published…