On October 21, 2020

Sad day for SCOTUS

Dear Editor,

Donald Trump and the Republican Senate majority have long conspired to tilt the balance of power toward the pockets of billionaires. Now they’re stacking the Supreme Court with another hard-right, corporate-friendly ringer who will inflict even more damage on ordinary Americans.

Throughout her confirmation hearings, Amy Coney Barrett claimed she was not “on a mission to destroy the Affordable Care Act.” That’s a shamelessly disingenuous dodge. She has publicly criticized previous rulings upholding the ACA and was explicitly selected by Trump and a powerful cabal of big-money lobbyists as a reliable vote to kill the health care law when it’s challenged in the Supreme Court on Nov. 10.

If the ACA dies, millions of Americans immediately lose health insurance amid a deadly pandemic now spiking in 44 states.  The insurance industry would again be free to punish the 54 million-

plus Americans with preexisting conditions by drastically increasing their premiums or denying coverage altogether.  And the number of Americans with preexisting conditions will only grow as many Covid-19 survivors suffer serious ongoing health issues.

Don’t count on Trump or the GOP to replace the ACA with a better health care bill. No new set of protections will magically appear if he manages to win.

Nor would the loss of the ACA be the only bad news flowing from her appointment to the court. The ideological bias of Barrett, who worked for the GOP in the Bush v. Gore debacle and whose father was an attorney for Shell Oil, far outweighs her judicial credentials. Her extremist views and corporate ties are a danger to American democracy and the civil liberties of everyone. Her writings and associations foretell any number of catastrophic court decisions.

She even declined to acknowledge climate change as scientific fact.

Barrett’s immediate value to Trump also goes beyond the ACA. She would not commit to recusing herself from an election challenge by Trump, nor so much as confirm that a president who decisively loses reelection must leave the White House peacefully, as required by law.

With an entrenched majority of hard line conservatives stacking the court, Barrett’s appointment represents the tragic corruption of our most trusted institution, in service to special interests. Our future depends on electing a Democratic president and Congressional majority to counterbalance such a dangerous bias and restore representation for the people.

Robin Vaughan
Kolderie

Hoosick, New York

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The magical mythical equalized pupil

May 15, 2024
By Tom Evslin Editor’s note: Tom Evslin, of Stowe, is a retired high-tech entrepreneur. He served as transportation secretary for Gov. Richard Snelling and stimulus czar for Gov. Jim Douglas. The Vermont Legislature is playing an expensive shell game — and planning worse. The “equalized pupil” is the shell under which the pea is hidden.…

Tell the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to protect the Connecticut River

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, It has been 12 years since the relicensing process began for five hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut River, and until May 22, there is an opportunity to comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  The last time these hydro facilities were licensed was in 1979, and once the new licenses are issued,…

UVM, don’t punish student protesters

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, As a pastor, I feel it is my professional and moral responsibility to speak to the crisis of conscience facing our nation and state. As of this writing, the civilian death toll in Gaza stands at around 34,654 according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. A third of these casualties are children. I do…

H.289: Good intentions on renewables but one big flaw

May 8, 2024
By David Bittersdorf Editor’s note: Dave Blittersdorf is the president of All Earth Renewables in Bristol. The Vermont General Assembly — in attempt to move the state to 100% renewable energy — is making changes to how the state’s utilities buy energy. Within the next couple of weeks, the Senate Natural Resources Committee will consider…