On July 29, 2020

Schools should prioritize in-person attendance for preschool-grade 5 and for students with special needs

Dear Editor,

Schools in Vermont support the academic, social and developmental needs of children, help address food insecurity, and provide mental health services. Weighing the health risks of reopening schools in fall 2020 against the educational and developmental risks of limiting in-person instruction, school districts should prioritize full-time, in person attendance for all students preschool through grade 5 and students of all ages with special needs.

On July 22, 2020, Vermont Health Commissioner Mark Levine stated, “In Vermont, this is the right time to open schools. We have achieved a stage of viral suppression that will allow us to open schools comfortably.”

Vermont pediatric infectious disease physicians, Dr. Benjamin Lee and Dr. William Raszka, recently wrote that serious consideration should be given to strategies that allow schools to remain open, even during periods of Covid-19 spread.

In multiple studies of transmission of Covid-19 within families, adults transmitted the disease to children in the family rather than children transmitting to adults. In most studies an adult was the index case more than 90% of the time, not the child. We are also reassured by the Vermont experience with childcare for essential workers throughout the pandemic and the reopening of childcare in June.

Several school-based studies, particularly in young children, have not shown significant transmission of Covid-19 within schools. In France, Ireland, and Australia, infected elementary school children did not transmit the disease to other children or adults despite exposure to large numbers of students.

Schools in many European countries with low rates of disease transmission resumed in-person learning this past spring using a variety of mitigation strategies. The data in those countries have been reassuring: Denmark, Norway, Holland  and Germany did not see an uptick in cases or significant school outbreaks.

The data all support the return to in-person learning in Vermont. Because Vermont has such a low Covid-19 prevalence rate, we can model our approach to school opening on the European experience.

Schools provide more than just academics to children and adolescents. In addition to reading, writing and math, children learn social and emotional skills, get exercise and access to mental health support and other services that cannot be provided with online learning.

While it will be impossible for schools to entirely eliminate the risk of Covid-19, young children in particular will be impacted by the absence of full-time, in-person learning and may suffer long-term academic consequences if they fall behind as a result.

Young children are still developing the skills to regulate their own behavior, emotions, and attention, and therefore struggle with distance learning. Remote or hybrid learning models are most challenging for young children and  require additional supervision.

We urge school districts in Vermont to prioritize return to full-time, in-person learning for children preschool – grade 5 and for students with special needs. Young children are at great risk for long-term developmental injury with the loss of full-time, in-person instruction.

Stephanie Winters, executive director, American Academy of Pediatrics Vermont Chapter

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…