On March 25, 2020

Voting against our needs

Dear Editor,

I’m trying to make sense of the recent VPR-Vermont PBS 2020 poll done in conjunction with Castleton University.  I’m not having much luck.

A strong majority, 74%, favored raising the minimum wage. A majority, 56%, favored the family leave bill even if it meant a tax increase. But, the poll said, if the election were held today Phil Scott would beat David Zuckerman 52% to 29%. Which is odd, to say the least, because Scott vetoed both the minimum wage and the family leave bills, while Zuckerman strongly supports both pieces of legislation.

How can people support a governor who vetoes two bills that they strongly support, essentially voting against their own interests?

The question seems especially relevant to our current COVID-19 health crisis.

Public safety concerns are causing considerable financial hardships to the very group of workers that would have benefited most from the family leave bill. Yet the Democratic-controlled legislature failed to pass the 2019 bill, which would have taken effect in time to help workers now, and failed by a single vote in the House to override the veto of the 2020 bill, which would have taken effect too late to help now.

Governor Scott’s future popularity will likely depend upon on how he squires Vermont through these trying times. However the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds here in Vermont, I hope that we learn some hard lessons.

Without the supports workers need, like a livable wage and family leave, our economy cannot function properly.

Charlie Murphy,

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The magical mythical equalized pupil

May 15, 2024
By Tom Evslin Editor’s note: Tom Evslin, of Stowe, is a retired high-tech entrepreneur. He served as transportation secretary for Gov. Richard Snelling and stimulus czar for Gov. Jim Douglas. The Vermont Legislature is playing an expensive shell game — and planning worse. The “equalized pupil” is the shell under which the pea is hidden.…

Tell the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to protect the Connecticut River

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, It has been 12 years since the relicensing process began for five hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut River, and until May 22, there is an opportunity to comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  The last time these hydro facilities were licensed was in 1979, and once the new licenses are issued,…

UVM, don’t punish student protesters

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, As a pastor, I feel it is my professional and moral responsibility to speak to the crisis of conscience facing our nation and state. As of this writing, the civilian death toll in Gaza stands at around 34,654 according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. A third of these casualties are children. I do…

H.289: Good intentions on renewables but one big flaw

May 8, 2024
By David Bittersdorf Editor’s note: Dave Blittersdorf is the president of All Earth Renewables in Bristol. The Vermont General Assembly — in attempt to move the state to 100% renewable energy — is making changes to how the state’s utilities buy energy. Within the next couple of weeks, the Senate Natural Resources Committee will consider…