On February 12, 2020

All employees deserve paid leave

Dear Editor,

We are women business owners who serve in the Legislature and we believe more Vermonters should have access to paid family leave in their time of need. Paid family leave should not be limited to people who work for large employers or have high-income jobs. As business owners, we know the value of our workers and we believe that paid family leave is good for employees and good for business. That’s why the House and Senate passed a plan to create a statewide paid family and medical leave program to cover more Vermonters. Simply put, we can’t afford to delay.

You never know when an unexpected illness or family tragedy will impact your home, job, or financial well-being. Today, too many Vermonters are shaken by hardship events that are out of their control. An accident, debilitating disease, family emergency, or opioid treatment and recovery can strike at any time. Workers who have an existing paid leave benefit are able to take the time they need to address these family needs, without fear of losing income or being fired. For the thousands of Vermonters who do not currently have access to paid time off, the legislature’s paid leave program would provide eligible Vermonters critical stability in time of need.

Younger workers would also benefit under a paid family and medical leave program. As legislators, we hear all the time about Vermont’s aging workforce and its impact on our tax base. This bill will help by making time off for a new child a less financially risky decision and by making Vermont’s support for new families an attractive reason to move and work here.

As business owners from different parts of the state, we’ve found that there are common challenges for small businesses and also tremendous opportunity for them to grow and thrive. In our experience, most businesses who don’t already offer these benefits would like to support their workers more than they can on their own. The legislature’s program would immediately assist eligible Vermonters, while providing employers the opportunity to offer more benefits.

The math is easy. If I have a pregnant employee who makes $15/hour and I want to give her 50 percent of her wages for 4 weeks of maternity leave, it would cost my business more than $2,400. Under this program, the cost drops to $62.40 per year for 12 weeks of 90 percent pay. The math would be similar for an employee who needs time off to care for a sick family member. This program would help with employee retention and loyalty in a time when it’s hard to find workers. And it would make it easier to attract new employees. It would also be far less expensive than managing employee turnover, which typically costs 2.5 times a person’s annual salary.

Some in the political arena have said that establishing a state paid family leave program is too risky and that a system should be voluntary. These same leaders support the creation of a paid leave benefit that is limited to the state employee workforce. While we support paid leave for these workers, we have to ask — why would we create a program exclusively for this group of workers if we can create a better, more secure program for more Vermonters?

Rep. Sarah Copeland Hanzas, Bradford

Rep. Lori Houghton, Essex Junction

Rep. Stephanie Jerome, Brandon

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…