On November 6, 2019

Hunting dogs: Finding a solution won’t be easy

By Angelo Lynn

The story of two hikers and their small dog being attacked by a pack of hunting hound dogs while hiking in the Green Mountain National Forest near the Goshen-Ripton border is as shocking as it is frightening. Frightening because the dogs surrounded and attacked the couple for much of the half hour they were under siege. Shocking because the story is such an outlier. As Game Warden Dale Whitlock said, “I’ve been a game warden since 1996 and I’ve never seen anything like this.”

As repercussions from this incident sugar out, what’s key to keep in mind is that no one is suggesting this incident should pit hunters against hikers. We all understand that hunters and hikers, and others who use the trails, should have equal access to public lands.

What will be at issue is the legal responsibility to maintain control over one’s hunting dogs, and how officials can assure the safety of others against any similar attack.

Readers should know that state regulations allow hunting dogs, usually hounds used in the pursuit of bear, to run free from the direct control of their owners. The hounds, which are equipped with GPS dog colors, typically circle the prey and keep the prey contained (up a tree or otherwise) until the hunters arrive.

The hikers involved in this particular incident are familiar with the area, have hiked in that part of the national forest for 35 years, and have come upon hunting dogs before without incident. In retelling their story, they were bold to make clear they have no argument with hunting or hunters, but also emphasize that neither should they or any other hikers or users of public lands be terrorized by dogs trained to surround their prey and attack.

Few would argue with that premise. Finding a solution, however, is likely to be much more complex.

Angelo Lynn is the editor and publisher of the Addison County Independent, a sister publication to the Mountain Times.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…