On August 31, 2017

A bloated firehouse

Dear Editor,

The following is in no way to disparage those who put in their effort to select a site, nor negotiate the sale price for the proposed firehouse. The following are facts we the citizens need to consider. An acre of land is 43,560 square feet, times 4 it equals 174,240 square feet. Fifty percent coverage on the site, to and including front, rear and side yard setbacks would give you the ability to erect a 87,120 square-foot building, and it would leave approximately 1.2 acres for  parking. On one acre you can park approximately 242 cars or 24 55-foot trailers. The price for the 4 acres is $550,000. Or $137,500 per acre. Do we need 4 acres? Consider this: if it were a 2.5-acre site, that would accommodate a building of 54,450 square-foot with approximately 1.25 acres for parking. At the current negotiated price that would mean a cost of $343,750, or a saving of $206,250. There is also an add-on of approximately $84,360 which is for engineering investigation and design. We’ve been told that this expenditure will in no way affect our taxes. However, the estimated cost of the proposed structure is between $3.5 and $4 million dollars. That, of course, will not be free. So fellow citizens, be careful of this proposal. Do we need 4 acres? Do we need to absorb the possible total cost of some $5 to $6 million dollars for this project? Come to the meeting Thurs., Aug. 31, ask questions, be a concerned citizen.

Richard Kropp, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…